A
Azhar bin Abdul Hamid
J 4 cases
About J Azhar bin Abdul Hamid
Azhar bin Abdul Hamid has been involved in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning May 2025 to September 2025. These cases are from the High Court (4 cases). Azhar bin Abdul Hamid served as the delivering judge in 4 of these cases. Azhar bin Abdul Hamid holds the designation of Dato'.
4
Total Cases
4
Delivered
0
Sat On (Coram)
How many cases has Azhar bin Abdul Hamid been involved in?
Azhar bin Abdul Hamid has been involved in 4 published judgments from May 2025 to September 2025, serving as the delivering judge in 4 of them. Cases span the High Court (4 cases).
Practice Areas
The following constitute my rationale in deciding this matter whereby I dismissed the notice of motion filed by the accused dated 10/04/2025 to lodge an appeal out of time. Aggrieved with my decision, the accused person being the applicant lodged a notice of appeal dated 24/06/2025 to the Court of Appeal regarding my said decision. Premised on the rationale stated above, it is my well contemplated view that the accused person being the applicant in this matter had failed to satisfy the legal requirements of section 310 Criminal Procedure Code for a leave to appeal out of time and accordingly her prayers in notice of motion dated 10/04/2025 is dismissed. 1 Ini adalah satu permohonan untuk mendapatkan Writ of Habeas Corpus oleh Pemohon yang telah ditahan di Pusat Pemulihan Akhlak, Bintulu, Sarawak untuk tempoh dua tahun melalui satu perintah bertarikh 06.03.2025 yang dikeluarkan oleh Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri (TMDN) di bawah seksyen 6(1) Akta Dadah Berbahaya (Langkah-Langkah Pencegahan Khas) 1985 (Akta) mulai dari tarikh yang sama. 1 Di dalam kes ini, Pemohon telah menimbulkan isu-isu berikut: 1 3.1. Pelanggaran terhadap prinsip keadilan asasi (natural justice) dalam proses penghasilan laporan lengkap siasatan oleh Pegawai Penyiasat di bawah seksyen 3(3) Akta; 1 3.2. Kelewatan selama 15 hari oleh Pegawai Siasatan Kementerian Dalam Negeri dalam mengemukakan laporan wajib di bawah seksyen 5(4) Akta tersebut kepada Menteri Dalam Negeri; dan 1 3.3. Wujudnya ketidakpatuhan terhadap peruntukan di bawah seksyen 6(1) Akta tersebut dibaca Bersama seksyen 54(2) Akta Tafsiran 1948 dan 1967 akibat kelewatan selama 23 hari oleh Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri dalam mengeluarkan perintah tahanan tehadap Pemohon. 1 Sebagai kesimpulan, saya mendapati bahawa terdapat merit dalam permohon ini di mana wujudnya pelanggaran terhadap prinsip keadilan asasi terhadap Pemohon. Oleh yang demikian, permohonan Writ of Habeas Corpus Pemohon adalah dibenarkan. 1 The following constitute my rationale in deciding this matter whereby upon plea of guilty, I sentenced the accused person to an imprisonment term of twelve (12) years from the date of arrest on the alternative charge under section 12 (2) of the DDA 1952 Act 234 (DDA) and punishable under section 39A(2) of the same Act. Aggrieved with my decision, the accused person lodged a notice of appeal dated 20th of May 2025 pertaining to the sentence only. 1
Cases Delivered (4)
wa-44-87-05-2025 MYHC
YAP THIAM HUAT v 1. ) TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 2. ) PENGUASA KANAN PUSAT PEMULIHAN AKHLAK BINTULU, SARAWAK 3. ) KETUA POLIS NEGARA
24 September 2025
wa-44-62-04-2025 MYHC
LEENA KUMARI A/P SELVARAJAH v Pendakwa Raya
19 June 2025
wa-45a-50-08-2023 MYHC
PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] TERTUDUH TAN TECK LAI
20 May 2025
wa-45a-102-10-2022 MYHC
PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] TERTUDUH LELE BIN MAHMUD
15 May 2025