AMIT BHATIA MATU RAM BHATIA (No. Passport. R2339811) dan DEEPIKA BHATIA (No. Passport. X9296359) yang berniaga di bawah nama dan gaya OM SHREE GENERAL TRADING FZC (Formation No. 4416499) v 1. ) SAHA ASIA INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD. (kini dikenali sebagai PALM VISTA OILS SDN. BHD 2. ) ABDUL RAZAK BIN MOHD RASUL yang berniaga di bawah nama dan gaya SANJUNG WAJA RESOURCES (No. Pendaftaran. 201703345506 / (SA0445930-T) 3. ) LEGEND SHIPPING AGENCIES (M) SDN BHD PIHAK TERKILAN Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia
Catchwords
Civil Procedure — Injunction — Interlocutory mandatory injunction — Principles governing grant — Whether plaintiff raised a case that was unusually strong and clear — Whether balance of convenience favoured preservation of status quo — Whether damages adequate remedy — Whether plaintiff entitled to substituted performance of security sum — Consent order — Liberty to apply — Whether time for compliance expired — Power of court to issue directions to give effect — Whether payment by third party valid — Contracts Act 1950, s.41 — Sale of Goods Act 1957, ss.19(1) & 27 — Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1950, ss.2 & 4, Hague Rules art III rr.3, 4 & 7 — Rules of Court 2012, O.3 r.4, O.29 r.1 & O.42 r.12 — Specific Reliefs Act 1950, s.53 — Contracts Act 1950, s.41. Equity — Relief against forfeiture — Principles — Whether disproportionate to forfeit fully-paid cargo for minor outstanding balance.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
AMIT BHATIA MATU RAM BHATIA (No. Passport. R2339811) dan DEEPIKA BHATIA (No. ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 18, 2025 (citation: wa-27ncc-37-07-2025). The case was decided by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff.
Key issues: Equity — Relief against forfeiture — Principles — Whether disproportionate to forfeit fully-paid cargo for minor outstanding balance..
What was the outcome of AMIT BHATIA MATU RAM BHATIA (No. Passport. R2339811) dan DEEPIKA BHATIA (No. ...?
AMIT BHATIA MATU RAM BHATIA (No. Passport. R2339811) dan DEEPIKA BHATIA (No. ... is a High Court decision dated August 18, 2025. The case was heard by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff. See the full judgment for details.