MUDAJAYA CORPORATION BERHAD v CREST WORLDWIDE RESOURCES SDN BHD
Catchwords
Introduction 1. The Plaintiff’s action against the Defendant in this suit was for the enforceability of 3 Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) entered between them. 2. The Court after perusing the pleadings decided that the dispute between the parties could be resolved based on legal arguments based on the documents filed by the parties. 3. Accordingly the Court applying Order 33 of the Rules of Court 2012 (“the Rules”) directed the parties on the issue “Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of the 3 SPAs”. 4. Order 33 of the Rules stipulates as follows: 2. Time of trial of questions or issues (O. 33 r. 2) The Court may order any question or issue arising in a cause or matter, whether of fact or law or partly of fact and partly of law, and whether raised by the pleadings or otherwise, to be tried before, at or after the trial of the cause or matter, and may give directions as to the manner in which the question or issue shall be stated. Conclusion 17. It is therefore concluded that the Plaintiff is entitled to the specific performance of the 3 SPAs.
Practice Areas
Introduction 1. The Plaintiff’s action against the Defendant in this suit was for the enforceability of 3 Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) entered between them. 2. The Court after perusing the pleadings decided that the dispute between the parties could be resolved based on legal arguments based on the documents filed by the parties. 3. Accordingly the Court applying Order 33 of the Rules of Court 2012 (“the Rules”) directed the parties on the issue “Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of the 3 SPAs”. 4. Order 33 of the Rules stipulates as follows: 2. Time of trial of questions or issues (O. 33 r. 2) The Court may order any question or issue arising in a cause or matter, whether of fact or law or partly of fact and partly of law, and whether raised by the pleadings or otherwise, to be tried before, at or after the trial of the cause or matter, and may give directions as to the manner in which the question or issue shall be stated. Conclusion 17. It is therefore concluded that the Plaintiff is entitled to the specific performance of the 3 SPAs.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
MUDAJAYA CORPORATION BERHAD v CREST WORLDWIDE RESOURCES SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 21, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-359-05-2019). The case was decided by Akhtar bin Tahir.
Key issues: Introduction.
What was the outcome of MUDAJAYA CORPORATION BERHAD v CREST WORLDWIDE RESOURCES SDN BHD?
MUDAJAYA CORPORATION BERHAD v CREST WORLDWIDE RESOURCES SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated October 21, 2025. The case was heard by Akhtar bin Tahir. See the full judgment for details.