Lingkabau Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Pauzi Bin Antahar (trading As Kaansayan Enterprise) 2. ) Amat Md Yusof 3. ) Awang Shahminan Datuk Hj Ag Sahari 4. ) The State Government of Sabah
s-01ncvcw-561-08-2022 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 13 May 2025 • S-01(NCvC)(W)-561-08/2022 • 33 min read
Outcome
We thus dismiss the Plaintiff’s appeal (appeal 561) with costs of RM15,000 to the 1st Defendant subject to allocatur and another RM15,000 to the 2nd, 3rd and to 5th Defendants collectively, subject to allocatur. [71] In respect of the 1st Defendant’s appeal (appeal 562), we allow it in part with respect to nominal damages and so we allow costs of RM5,000 to the 1st Defendant as appellant, subject to allocatur.
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (10)
Jabatan Peguam Besar Negeri Sabah Firm Lind Willie Wong & Chin Firm Tan Pang Tsen & Co Firm Caroline Hee Jin Chiu Counsel Appellant Dayangku Noranisah Pengiran Hassnel Counsel Respondent Delonia Chong Counsel Respondent Devina Teo Counsel Respondent Irwin Chang Counsel Respondent Liew Chih Ching Counsel Respondent Morgan Tsen Counsel Appellant
Statutes Cited
Forest Enactment
s 24(6)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (s-01ncvcw-561-08-2022)