ABDUL LATIFF BIN PUTEH & 347 YANG LAIN v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Jajahan Pasir Mas 2. ) Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan

01i-21-05-2022d Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) 27 September 2022 • 01(i)-21-05/2022(D)

Catchwords

The 348 appellants before us were the plaintiffs whose claims against the respondents were struck out by the High Court upon the application of the respondents [enclosure 29]. The principal if not the sole reason for allowing the interlocutory application was because the action was “obviously unsustainable” as the plaintiffs lacked locus standi to maintain the action.

Practice Areas

The 348 appellants before us were the plaintiffs whose claims against the respondents were struck out by the High Court upon the application of the respondents enclosure 29. The principal if not the sole reason for allowing the interlocutory application was because the action was “obviously unsustainable” as the plaintiffs lacked locus standi to maintain the action.

Judges (3)

Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim Coram Mary Lim Thiam Suan Coram Vernon Ong Lam Kiat Delivered

Parties (3)

Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan Respondent Abdul Latiff bin Puteh Appellant Pentadbir Tanah Jajahan Pasir Mas Respondent

Case Significance

ABDUL LATIFF BIN PUTEH & 347 YANG LAIN v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Jajahan Pasir M... is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated September 27, 2022 (citation: 01i-21-05-2022d). The panel comprised Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim, Mary Lim Thiam Suan and Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, with Vernon Ong Lam Kiat delivering the judgment.

What was the outcome of ABDUL LATIFF BIN PUTEH & 347 YANG LAIN v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Jajahan Pasir M...?

ABDUL LATIFF BIN PUTEH & 347 YANG LAIN v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Jajahan Pasir M... is a Federal Court decision dated September 27, 2022. The case was heard by Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim. See the full judgment for details.