Unjust enrichment
3 cases · June 2025 to December 2025
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
the Defendant must not be allowed hiding behind the issue of lack of privity of contract to negate the liability to refund the outstanding balance of the Loan when he fails to discharge the evidential burden incumbent upon him as to the utilisation of the money — the Defendant enjoyed the benefit of the Loan and he must be responsible to repay it 1 matter was not pleaded — parties are bound by their pleadings. 1 Fees and charges received for worthless instrument — Whether defendant unjustly enriched — Whether restitutionary remedy available — Contracts Act 1950, s.71 1
the Defendant must not be allowed hiding behind the issue of lack of privity of contract to negate the liability to refund the outstanding balance of the Loan when he fails to discharge the evidential burden incumbent upon him as to the utilisation of the money — the Defendant enjoyed the benefit of the Loan and he must be responsible to repay it 1 case
matter was not pleaded — parties are bound by their pleadings. 1 case
Fees and charges received for worthless instrument — Whether defendant unjustly enriched — Whether restitutionary remedy available — Contracts Act 1950, s.71 1 case
Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Cases
bl-12bncc-5-12-2024
NA YONG CHEN v SIOW KHIEN MENG
2 December 2025
MYHC
ka-12bncvc-6-06-2024
1. ) KETUA SETIAUSAHA KEMENTERIAN KEMAJUAN LUAR BANDAR DAN WILAYAH 2. ) Kerajaan Malaysia v 1. ) ASPES MECHANICAL SDN BHD 2. ) BAKTIJAYA RESOURCES SDN BHD
9 November 2025
MYHC
wa-22m-289-12-2021
1. ) MEGAH BERKAT SDN BHD 2. ) CHOK TIN YONG 3. ) CHOK TENG HIAN v MBSB BANK BERHAD
22 June 2025
MYHC