1. ) KETUA SETIAUSAHA KEMENTERIAN KEMAJUAN LUAR BANDAR DAN WILAYAH 2. ) Kerajaan Malaysia v 1. ) ASPES MECHANICAL SDN BHD 2. ) BAKTIJAYA RESOURCES SDN BHD
Catchwords
Appeal arises from the decision of the Sessions Court - Plaintif's claim against 2nd & 3rd Defendants was allowed - 2nd & 3rd dissatisfied with that outcome. The law on appeal - not interfere with the findings of fact - unless the trial court plainly gone wrong. The finding fails to give sufficient attention to the following stipulations in the documentary evidence - there is another document which was not reffered to - Failure to refer to the further exclusions - issue of privity of contract. Unjust enrichment - matter was not pleaded - parties are bound by their pleadings. The appeal is allowed - Plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
1. ) KETUA SETIAUSAHA KEMENTERIAN KEMAJUAN LUAR BANDAR DAN WILAYAH 2. ) Keraj... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 9, 2025 (citation: ka-12bncvc-6-06-2024). The case was decided by Mohd Aimi Zaini bin Mohd Azhar.
Key issues: Appeal arises from the decision of the Sessions Court - Plaintif's claim against 2nd & 3rd Defendants was allowed - 2nd & 3rd dissatisfied with that outcome..
What was the outcome of 1. ) KETUA SETIAUSAHA KEMENTERIAN KEMAJUAN LUAR BANDAR DAN WILAYAH 2. ) Keraj...?
1. ) KETUA SETIAUSAHA KEMENTERIAN KEMAJUAN LUAR BANDAR DAN WILAYAH 2. ) Keraj... is a High Court decision dated November 9, 2025. The case was heard by Mohd Aimi Zaini bin Mohd Azhar. See the full judgment for details.