Civil appeal
15 cases · August 2021 to January 2026
Case Volume by Year
1 21
1 24
12 25
1 26
2021–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Breach of confidence — Passing Off — Conspiracy to injure — Unlawful interference with trade — Breach of directors’ duties — Appeal allowed 1 Appeal against decision of Magistrates’ Court — Standard of review — Whether decision against the weight of evidence — Whether findings of fact perverse or plainly wrong 1 filed by the Defendant against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge in allowing the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant with cost after a full trial 1 Sale and purchase agreement — Liquidated agreed damages (LAD) — Delay in delivery of vacant possession — Force majeure — Delay by public authority (Tenaga Nasional Berhad) — Extension of time — Architect’s opinion and engineer’s certification — Contractual compliance — Parties bound by pleadings — No error of law or fact — Appeal dismissed — Decision affirmed — Costs to respondent 1 Decision of the Sessions Court — After a full trial — Record of Appeal filed within time — But served out of time — Application for extension of time — No good reason — Failure to obtain leave to file Supplementary Record of Appeal — Order 55 Rule 4 (1) read together with Rule 4 (2), ROC 2012 — Preliminary objection — Service of Notice of Appeal via email — Whether valid service — Order 62 Rule 6 (1) (cc) ROC 2012 — Service of documents via email in accordance with any Practice Direction issued — No Practice Direction issued to date — Whether it is a technical non-compliance — Whether can be cured pursuant to Order 1A ROC, 2012. 1 appeal against the decision of the Magistrate in allowing the Plaintiffs’ claim against the Defendant. 1 Dispute regarding a will — Whether the learned trial judge erred in failing to consider that the said Property is a matrimonial asset of the deceased and DW3 — Whether the said Property is held on trust by the deceased for the Defendant, DW3 and ooi Ai Lin — Whether the will is a forgery — Appeal is dismissed 1 appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge in allowing the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant 1 Pensionable members of the Malaysian Armed Forces — Article 132, 137 and 147 of the Federal Constitution — Armed Forces Act 1972 — Pensions Regulations 1982 — Whether any pension adjustment had been carried out from 2002 to 2013 by the Defendants — Whether there was unequal treatment by the Defendants in the Plaintiff’s pensions adjustments — Appeal by the Defendants is allowed. 1 Recovery of money — Whether the sum given is an investment or a personal loan — Probability of the case based on undisputed facts, pleaded case and evidence — Misapprehension of facts and law — Presumption of moneylending — Burden of proof — Section 10OA of the Moneylenders Act 1951 1 appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge in dismissing the Plaintiff claim against the Defendant in meter tampering case 1 Tort of negligence and breach of statutory duties — issuance of CFs — expert evidence — The burden of proving its claims rest with the Appellants — Appeal is dismissed 1 Judicial review application — Whether the Appellant has the right under section 124 of the National Land Code to challenge the variation of the express condition of the Subject Land — Whether the Appellant has the locus standi to commence this judicial review proceeding against 1st dan 2nd Repondents on the 1st and 2nd Respondents’ decision to allow the 3rd Respondent’s rezoning application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 — Whether the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 contains any provisions that would allow or prohibit a neighbour from participating in the rezoning process of the Subject Land — Appeal is dismissed 1 Medical negligence — Liability was admitted and consent judgment was recorded between parties — Appeal against quantum of damages — General damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities to life — Appellant’s appeal is allowed in part and Respondent’s cross-appeal is dismissed 1 failure to serve Draft Index of Documents — whether appellant's record of appeal and appeal ought to be dismissed for this reason. 1
Breach of confidence — Passing Off — Conspiracy to injure — Unlawful interference with trade — Breach of directors’ duties — Appeal allowed 1 case
Appeal against decision of Magistrates’ Court — Standard of review — Whether decision against the weight of evidence — Whether findings of fact perverse or plainly wrong 1 case
filed by the Defendant against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge in allowing the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant with cost after a full trial 1 case
Decision of the Sessions Court — After a full trial — Record of Appeal filed within time — But served out of time — Application for extension of time — No good reason — Failure to obtain leave to file Supplementary Record of Appeal — Order 55 Rule 4 (1) read together with Rule 4 (2), ROC 2012 — Preliminary objection — Service of Notice of Appeal via email — Whether valid service — Order 62 Rule 6 (1) (cc) ROC 2012 — Service of documents via email in accordance with any Practice Direction issued — No Practice Direction issued to date — Whether it is a technical non-compliance — Whether can be cured pursuant to Order 1A ROC, 2012. 1 case
appeal against the decision of the Magistrate in allowing the Plaintiffs’ claim against the Defendant. 1 case
Dispute regarding a will — Whether the learned trial judge erred in failing to consider that the said Property is a matrimonial asset of the deceased and DW3 — Whether the said Property is held on trust by the deceased for the Defendant, DW3 and ooi Ai Lin — Whether the will is a forgery — Appeal is dismissed 1 case
appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge in allowing the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant 1 case
Pensionable members of the Malaysian Armed Forces — Article 132, 137 and 147 of the Federal Constitution — Armed Forces Act 1972 — Pensions Regulations 1982 — Whether any pension adjustment had been carried out from 2002 to 2013 by the Defendants — Whether there was unequal treatment by the Defendants in the Plaintiff’s pensions adjustments — Appeal by the Defendants is allowed. 1 case
Recovery of money — Whether the sum given is an investment or a personal loan — Probability of the case based on undisputed facts, pleaded case and evidence — Misapprehension of facts and law — Presumption of moneylending — Burden of proof — Section 10OA of the Moneylenders Act 1951 1 case
appeal against the decision of the Sessions Court Judge in dismissing the Plaintiff claim against the Defendant in meter tampering case 1 case
Tort of negligence and breach of statutory duties — issuance of CFs — expert evidence — The burden of proving its claims rest with the Appellants — Appeal is dismissed 1 case
Judicial review application — Whether the Appellant has the right under section 124 of the National Land Code to challenge the variation of the express condition of the Subject Land — Whether the Appellant has the locus standi to commence this judicial review proceeding against 1st dan 2nd Repondents on the 1st and 2nd Respondents’ decision to allow the 3rd Respondent’s rezoning application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 — Whether the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 contains any provisions that would allow or prohibit a neighbour from participating in the rezoning process of the Subject Land — Appeal is dismissed 1 case
Medical negligence — Liability was admitted and consent judgment was recorded between parties — Appeal against quantum of damages — General damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities to life — Appellant’s appeal is allowed in part and Respondent’s cross-appeal is dismissed 1 case
failure to serve Draft Index of Documents — whether appellant's record of appeal and appeal ought to be dismissed for this reason. 1 case
Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Cases
w-02ipcvw-1707-10-2023
1. ) TAN PIT MOOI 2. ) SIGNATURE CONCEPTS SDN BHD 3. ) NG KOK LEONG 4. ) HYGIENE LIVING SDN. BHD. 5. ) Seow Hon Seong 6. ) PROTECTION BRANDS PTY LTD 7. ) HYGIENE HEALTH PTY LTD 8. ) CHRISTOPHER DAVID PLASTOW 9. ) MARK CHRISTOPHER PETTITT v JAIA SDN BHD
28 January 2026
MYCOA
wa-11bncvc-22-06-2025
KURNIA EKUITI SDN. BHD. v TM TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SDN. BHD.
9 December 2025
MYHC
bl-12bncc-5-12-2024
NA YONG CHEN v SIOW KHIEN MENG
2 December 2025
MYHC
ja-12bncvc-24-10-2024
EXCELENTE AMIGOS SDN BHD v MAH SING PROPERTIES SDN BHD
3 November 2025
MYHC
ma-12bncc-6-11-2024
QUICKASH MALAYSIA SDN BHD v 1. ) WIDENOTE SDN BHD 2. ) TEO LAY BAN 3. ) WEE SIEW TIEN
30 October 2025
MYHC
bl-11bncvc-4-03-2025
Prem Shivani Sdn Bhd v 1. ) PARVATHY A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) VASANTHI A/P RAMAN
9 October 2025
MYHC
p-02ncvcw-894-06-2023
OOI JOO AIK v TAN SUAN SIM
1 September 2025
MYCOA
bl-12bncc-2-02-2025
MAGEALA A/P THARMALINGAM v MZP CONSTRUCTION & TRADING
1 July 2025
MYHC
w-01ncvca-109-02-2024
1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) PERDANA MENTERI MALAYSIA 3. ) MENTERI KANAN PERTAHANAN MALAYSIA 4. ) MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA v 1. ) MIOR ROSLI BIN MIOR MD JAAFAR 2. ) BASIR BIN AB. RAHMAN 3. ) ANUAR BIN ABDUL HAMID 4. ) YAAKOB BIN MD LAZID 5. ) MOHD NAWI BIN HUSIN 6. ) SHUIB BIN TAIB 7. ) ABDUL HALIM BIN LONG 8. ) ZAMZALI BIN SEMAN 9. ) SHAHAWARUDIN BIN ISMAIL 10. ) BATUMALAI @ PURUSOTHAMAN A/L BATUMALAI 11. ) ARUJUNAN A/L WAIRAMUTHU 12. ) SHARUDDIN BIN ISMAIL 13. ) ISHAK BIN YACCOB 14. ) ZAINAL ...
3 June 2025
MYCOA
ba-12bncc-15-10-2024
1. ) HO YOKE KIEN 2. ) LOH WOON PEI v CHOW HENG
18 May 2025
MYHC
bl-12bncvc-8-08-2024
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v VISION CRAFT ENTERPRISE SDN BHD
27 April 2025
MYHC
p-02cw-1658-10-2023
Perbadanan Pengurusan One Tanjong v Province Valley Sdn Bhd
22 April 2025
MYCOA
p-01a-454-08-2023
TANG HENG LUT (MENDAKWA ATAS PIHAK SENDIRI, TANG HENG CHAI DAN BAGI PIHAK PEMILIK-PEMILIK UNTUK 48 UNIT-UNIT DALAM KONDOMINIUM ONE TANJONG) v 1. ) JAWATANKUASA PERANCANG NEGERI PULAU PINANG 2. ) PENGARAH JABATAN PERANCANGAN BANDAR DAN DESA NEGERI PULAU PINANG 3. ) Lone Pine Residence Sdn. Bhd.
21 January 2025
MYCOA
a-01ncvcw-84-02-2023
1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) PENGARAH HOSPITAL TAIPING v NURUL RABIHAH BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN
19 June 2024
MYCOA
12b-7-01-2019
Chan Hwa Meng v 1. Poongothai a/p Subramaniam [Mendakwa sebagai balu yang sah dan orang tanggungan Muniandy a/l Seenivasan, si mati] 2. Shalini a/p Muniandy [Mendakwa sebagai anak yang sah serta orang- 3. Vinoth a/p Muniandy orang tanggungan Muniandy a/l Seenivasan, si 4. Kiritiga a/p Muniandy mati,membawa tuntutan ini melalui wakil litigasi 5. Kavinesh a/p Muniandy mereka Poongothai a/p Subramaniam] 6. Veerammal a/p Manickam [Mendakwa sebagai ibu yang sah dan orang tanggungan Muniandy a/l Se...
5 August 2021
MYHC