S
Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (persendirian) Kuala Lumpur
Person 1 case
Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (persendirian) Kuala Lumpur appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:
wa-12bncvc-127-10-2024
L Vince Sdn Bhd v Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (Persendirian) Kuala Lumpur
MYHC 19 February 2025
See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.
About Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (persendirian) Kuala Lumpur
Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (persendirian) Kuala Lumpur appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning February 2025 to February 2025. Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (persendirian) Kuala Lumpur appeared as respondent in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).
How many court cases involve Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (persendirian) Kuala Lumpur?
Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (persendirian) Kuala Lumpur appears in 1 published judgment from February 2025 to February 2025. Most commonly as respondent (1 cases).
Practice Areas
This is an appeal by the plaintiff/appellant against the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claim with costs of RM10,000.00. 1 The facts revealed before the court showed that a contract was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant on 30 November 2016 for the plaintiff to operate a shop (school uniform shop) on the defendant's premises and to supply and sell uniforms designed specifically for the school. After the contract expired, the parties attempted to extend it for another three years, but could not agree on the terms. As part of the winding-down process, the plaintiff was allowed to stay on the premises without paying rent for a year. Despite this, the plaintiff claimed there was a renewal of the contract, but the defendant contested this, saying that the plaintiff had acknowledged in its email that the parties could not renew the agreement. 1 In the end, the appeal was dismissed with costs because there was no appealable error in the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision. In its decision, the High Court upheld the Sessions Court's finding that the parties did not renew their contract. 1