L Vince Sdn Bhd v Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (Persendirian) Kuala Lumpur
Catchwords
This is an appeal by the plaintiff/appellant against the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claim with costs of RM10,000.00. The facts revealed before the court showed that a contract was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant on 30 November 2016 for the plaintiff to operate a shop (school uniform shop) on the defendant's premises and to supply and sell uniforms designed specifically for the school. After the contract expired, the parties attempted to extend it for another three years, but could not agree on the terms. As part of the winding-down process, the plaintiff was allowed to stay on the premises without paying rent for a year. Despite this, the plaintiff claimed there was a renewal of the contract, but the defendant contested this, saying that the plaintiff had acknowledged in its email that the parties could not renew the agreement. In the end, the appeal was dismissed with costs because there was no appealable error in the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision. In its decision, the High Court upheld the Sessions Court's finding that the parties did not renew their contract.
Practice Areas
This is an appeal by the plaintiff/appellant against the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claim with costs of RM10,000.00. The facts revealed before the court showed that a contract was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant on 30 November 2016 for the plaintiff to operate a shop (school uniform shop) on the defendant's premises and to supply and sell uniforms designed specifically for the school. After the contract expired, the parties attempted to extend it for another three years, but could not agree on the terms. As part of the winding-down process, the plaintiff was allowed to stay on the premises without paying rent for a year. Despite this, the plaintiff claimed there was a renewal of the contract, but the defendant contested this, saying that the plaintiff had acknowledged in its email that the parties could not renew the agreement. In the end, the appeal was dismissed with costs because there was no appealable error in the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision. In its decision, the High Court upheld the Sessions Court's finding that the parties did not renew their contract.
Case Significance
L Vince Sdn Bhd v Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (Persendirian) Kuala Lumpur is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 19, 2025 (citation: wa-12bncvc-127-10-2024). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.
Key issues: This is an appeal by the plaintiff/appellant against the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claim with costs of RM10,000.00..
What was the outcome of L Vince Sdn Bhd v Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (Persendirian) Kuala Lumpur?
L Vince Sdn Bhd v Sekolah Menengah Stella Maris (Persendirian) Kuala Lumpur is a High Court decision dated February 19, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.