S

Sanusha a/p Murugaya

Person 1 case

Sanusha a/p Murugaya appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

ba-24ncvc-979-05-2025
1. ) ELIZABETH A/P PARIYANAN 2. ) JOHNSON RAMASAMY A/L MARAN 3. ) NANTHINE A/P THIRUVENGIDAM 4. ) GUNASEKARAN A/L MARAN v 1. ) MORGUN A/L V.NADESAN 2. ) USHAH DEVI A/P RAJAMANIKAM 3. ) MANISHADEVIE A/P MANIKUMAR 4. ) SANUSHA A/P MURUGAYA 5. ) MAYA VESVANATHAN 6. ) UTHAYARAAJ A/L BALAKRISHNAN
MYHC 23 September 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Sanusha a/p Murugaya

Sanusha a/p Murugaya appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning September 2025 to September 2025. Sanusha a/p Murugaya appeared as respondent in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Sanusha a/p Murugaya?

Sanusha a/p Murugaya appears in 1 published judgment from September 2025 to September 2025. Most commonly as respondent (1 cases).

Practice Areas

This is an originating summons filed by the Plaintiffs, who are members and former office bearers of Persatuan Jagaan Kanak-Kanak Ekliptik Klang (“the Association”), seeking declaratory and injunctive reliefs concerning the validity of their removal and the appointment of new committee members. The controversy arises from the unilateral action of the First Defendant in removing the Plaintiffs from their positions and replacing them with the Second to Sixth Defendants. Having considered the evidence and submissions, the Court is satisfied that the Plaintiffs have established serious irregularities in the removal and appointment exercise. The unilateral acts of the First Defendant in effecting changes to the Association’s committee and altering the Registrar of Societies records were unconstitutional and without lawful mandate. Such defects cannot be cured retrospectively by subsequent resolutions or adjustments. On the preliminary objection, I do not accept that this Court lacks jurisdiction. Section 16 of the Societies Act 1966 does vest the Registrar of Societies with supervisory powers, but the courts have consistently held that judicial intervention is warranted where there is a breach of a society’s constitution or denial of natural justice. 1

Respondent (1)

ba-24ncvc-979-05-2025 MYHC
1. ) ELIZABETH A/P PARIYANAN 2. ) JOHNSON RAMASAMY A/L MARAN 3. ) NANTHINE A/P THIRUVENGIDAM 4. ) GUNASEKARAN A/L MARAN v 1. ) MORGUN A/L V.NADESAN 2. ) USHAH DEVI A/P RAJAMANIKAM 3. ) MANISHADEVIE A/P MANIKUMAR 4. ) SANUSHA A/P MURUGAYA 5. ) MAYA VESVANATHAN 6. ) UTHAYARAAJ A/L BALAKRISHNAN
23 September 2025