Noorhasyimawati binti Jalaludin Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ahmad Aidei bin Jalaluddin, Simati

Person 1 case

Noorhasyimawati binti Jalaludin Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ahmad Aidei bin Jalaluddin, Simati appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

wa-22ncvc-535-09-2022

1. ) NAZLAN BIN BAHARUDIN 2. ) IZYAN LIYANA BINTI AZHAR (NO. K/P: 870703-56-5112) Dan MUHAMMAD AFIQ BIN AZHAR (NO. K/P: 900311-14-6159) [Pentadbir harta pusaka AZHAR BIN AHMAT (NO. K/P: 650904-07-5115), si mati yang telah meninggal dunia pada 17hb Januari, 2023] 3. ) TAN TOH NGUANG 4. ) DATIN RUPAWAN BINTI MOHD SHARIF 5. ) NIK MOHD ZAIDI BIN NIK MOHD ZAIN 6. ) AKIRA MORIWAKI 7. ) NOORHASYIMAWATI BINTI JALALUDIN Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka AHMAD AIDEI BIN JALALUDDIN, simati 8. ) YUSOFF BIN ...

MYHC 19 March 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Noorhasyimawati binti Jalaludin Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ahmad Aidei bin Jalaluddin, Simati

Noorhasyimawati binti Jalaludin Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ahmad Aidei bin Jalaluddin, Simati appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning March 2025 to March 2025. Noorhasyimawati binti Jalaludin Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ahmad Aidei bin Jalaluddin, Simati appeared as plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Noorhasyimawati binti Jalaludin Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ahmad Aidei bin Jalaluddin, Simati?

Noorhasyimawati binti Jalaludin Sebagai Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Ahmad Aidei bin Jalaluddin, Simati appears in 1 published judgment from March 2025 to March 2025. Most commonly as plaintiff (1 cases).

Practice Areas

Beneficial ownership and proprietary rights of purchasers in winding-up context. This case concerns the plaintiffs’ claim for beneficial ownership of their respective units in the “10 Semantan” development and the right to receive copies of strata titles in the context of the defendant company’s liquidation. The Court found that the plaintiffs had entered into valid sale and purchase agreements, paid the full purchase price and taken vacant possession. The Court held that official receipts were not the only valid proof of payment. Injunctive relief was granted to restrain the liquidators from disposing of the units. The judgment affirms that beneficial ownership may be proven through circumstantial and documentary evidence. 1

Plaintiff (1)

wa-22ncvc-535-09-2022 MYHC

19 March 2025