M

Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad

Person 1 case

Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

wa-22ncvc-267-05-2022
1. ) Abdul Halim Bin Mubarak 2. ) Abeha B. Mohd Yasin 3. ) Aini Bt Hamid 4. ) Aishah Mariam Bt K. Thamby Sahib 5. ) Azirridzam Bin Hamid 6. ) Ridwan Rodrigues Bin Abdullah 7. ) Che Haminah Bt Che Harun 8. ) Chin Yan Mooi 9. ) Chris Ng Ah Kwan 10. ) Edi Irawan Bin Mohammad Zen 11. ) Haliza Bt. Hashim 12. ) Jamal Bin Sahak 13. ) Jasniruson Bin Adam 14. ) Hasniah Binti Sharif 15. ) Kanageswari A/P Muniandy 16. ) Majid Bin Mat Zin 17. ) Maznah Binti Yusoff 18. ) Marzuki B. Daud 19. ) Grace Tai Ko...
MYHC 15 July 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad

Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning July 2025 to July 2025. Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad appeared as plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad?

Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad appears in 1 published judgment from July 2025 to July 2025. Most commonly as plaintiff (1 cases).

Practice Areas

1 This is a claim by the Plaintiffs against the 1st Defendant (D1) and/or the 2nd Defendant (D2) (collectively referred to as the Defendants) and/or 3rd Defendant (D3) jointly and severally as stated in Paragraph 35 of the Plaintiffs’ Amended Statement of Claim. 1 2 The Plaintiffs were employed by D1 until 1.2.2017, when their employment was transferred to D3. D1 entered the Lease Agreement with MGH in 2016, which later transitioned to D3. All of which, the Plaintiffs were unaware of their employment migration until the Townhall Meeting on 26.01.2017. 1 3 This Court finds that the fact remained that the New Lease Agreement with D3 happened without the knowledge of the Plaintiffs, and that their employment was transferred from D1 to D3 without the Plaintiffs’ consent and/or knowledge, inducing the Plaintiffs to thereafter accepting the offer of employment from D3 purportedly on a "no less favourable terms". The letter dated 1.2.2017 from D1 (Release Letter) was an attempt to circumvent D1’s contractual and/or statutory obligations to release or discharge itself from liabilities in terms of the retirement benefits that was expected by the Plaintiffs. 1 4 This Court awarded damages in lieu of one month’s notice amounting to RM63,952.53 as per the calculation in Schedule A based on the basic salary of the Plaintiffs. 1 5 Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and totality of the evidence, this Court is of the considered view that the Plaintiffs have successfully proven their claim against D1 and ordered accordingly. 1

Plaintiff (1)

wa-22ncvc-267-05-2022 MYHC
1. ) Abdul Halim Bin Mubarak 2. ) Abeha B. Mohd Yasin 3. ) Aini Bt Hamid 4. ) Aishah Mariam Bt K. Thamby Sahib 5. ) Azirridzam Bin Hamid 6. ) Ridwan Rodrigues Bin Abdullah 7. ) Che Haminah Bt Che Harun 8. ) Chin Yan Mooi 9. ) Chris Ng Ah Kwan 10. ) Edi Irawan Bin Mohammad Zen 11. ) Haliza Bt. Hashim 12. ) Jamal Bin Sahak 13. ) Jasniruson Bin Adam 14. ) Hasniah Binti Sharif 15. ) Kanageswari A/P Muniandy 16. ) Majid Bin Mat Zin 17. ) Maznah Binti Yusoff 18. ) Marzuki B. Daud 19. ) Grace Tai Ko...
15 July 2025