1. ) Abdul Halim Bin Mubarak 2. ) Abeha B. Mohd Yasin 3. ) Aini Bt Hamid 4. ) Aishah Mariam Bt K. Thamby Sahib 5. ) Azirridzam Bin Hamid 6. ) Ridwan Rodrigues Bin Abdullah 7. ) Che Haminah Bt Che Harun 8. ) Chin Yan Mooi 9. ) Chris Ng Ah Kwan 10. ) Edi Irawan Bin Mohammad Zen 11. ) Haliza Bt. Hashim 12. ) Jamal Bin Sahak 13. ) Jasniruson Bin Adam 14. ) Hasniah Binti Sharif 15. ) Kanageswari A/P Muniandy 16. ) Majid Bin Mat Zin 17. ) Maznah Binti Yusoff 18. ) Marzuki B. Daud 19. ) Grace Tai Ko...
Catchwords
[1] This is a claim by the Plaintiffs against the 1st Defendant (D1) and/or the 2nd Defendant (D2) (collectively referred to as the Defendants) and/or 3rd Defendant (D3) jointly and severally as stated in Paragraph 35 of the Plaintiffs’ Amended Statement of Claim. [2] The Plaintiffs were employed by D1 until 1.2.2017, when their employment was transferred to D3. D1 entered the Lease Agreement with MGH in 2016, which later transitioned to D3. All of which, the Plaintiffs were unaware of their employment migration until the Townhall Meeting on 26.01.2017. [3] This Court finds that the fact remained that the New Lease Agreement with D3 happened without the knowledge of the Plaintiffs, and that their employment was transferred from D1 to D3 without the Plaintiffs’ consent and/or knowledge, inducing the Plaintiffs to thereafter accepting the offer of employment from D3 purportedly on a "no less favourable terms". The letter dated 1.2.2017 from D1 (Release Letter) was an attempt to circumvent D1’s contractual and/or statutory obligations to release or discharge itself from liabilities in terms of the retirement benefits that was expected by the Plaintiffs. [4] This Court awarded damages in lieu of one month’s notice amounting to RM63,952.53 as per the calculation in Schedule A based on the basic salary of the Plaintiffs. [5] Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and totality of the evidence, this Court is of the considered view that the Plaintiffs have successfully proven their claim against D1 and ordered accordingly.
Practice Areas
1 This is a claim by the Plaintiffs against the 1st Defendant (D1) and/or the 2nd Defendant (D2) (collectively referred to as the Defendants) and/or 3rd Defendant (D3) jointly and severally as stated in Paragraph 35 of the Plaintiffs’ Amended Statement of Claim. 2 The Plaintiffs were employed by D1 until 1.2.2017, when their employment was transferred to D3. D1 entered the Lease Agreement with MGH in 2016, which later transitioned to D3. All of which, the Plaintiffs were unaware of their employment migration until the Townhall Meeting on 26.01.2017. 3 This Court finds that the fact remained that the New Lease Agreement with D3 happened without the knowledge of the Plaintiffs, and that their employment was transferred from D1 to D3 without the Plaintiffs’ consent and/or knowledge, inducing the Plaintiffs to thereafter accepting the offer of employment from D3 purportedly on a "no less favourable terms". The letter dated 1.2.2017 from D1 (Release Letter) was an attempt to circumvent D1’s contractual and/or statutory obligations to release or discharge itself from liabilities in terms of the retirement benefits that was expected by the Plaintiffs. 4 This Court awarded damages in lieu of one month’s notice amounting to RM63,952.53 as per the calculation in Schedule A based on the basic salary of the Plaintiffs. 5 Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and totality of the evidence, this Court is of the considered view that the Plaintiffs have successfully proven their claim against D1 and ordered accordingly.
Judges (1)
Parties (42)
Kumpulan Peransang Selangor Berhad Defendant LEO HOSPITALITY Sdn Bhd (DALAM LIKUIDASI) Defendant PERANGSANG HOTEL AND PROPERTIES Sdn Bhd Defendant Abdul Halim bin Mubarak Plaintiff Abeha b. Mohd Yasin Plaintiff Aini bt Hamid Plaintiff Aishah Mariam bt K. Thamby Sahib Plaintiff Azirridzam bin Hamid Plaintiff Che Haminah bt Che Harun Plaintiff Chin Yan Mooi Plaintiff Chris Ng Ah Kwan Plaintiff Edi Irawan bin Mohammad Zen Plaintiff Grace Tai Koy Ying Plaintiff Haliza bt. Hashim Plaintiff Hasniah binti Sharif Plaintiff Jamal bin Sahak Plaintiff Jasniruson bin Adam Plaintiff Kanageswari a/p Muniandy Plaintiff Majid bin Mat Zin Plaintiff Marzuki b. Daud Plaintiff Maznah binti Yusoff Plaintiff Md.salleh b. Mat Yassin Plaintiff Mohd Azrul bin Ahmad Plaintiff Mohd Zahari bin Othman Plaintiff Mohd. Nor Asmawi bin Mustapha Plaintiff Muhammad Firdaus b. Abdul Hamid Plaintiff Muhammad Rayyan bin Duhaylungsod Plaintiff Muhammad Yunus b. Samiun Plaintiff Muhammad Zainizam bin Abdul Najib Plaintiff Musehni b. Ali Plaintiff Nazori b. Hassan Plaintiff Norhisham b. Nordin Plaintiff Nurul Shakila bt Mazlan Plaintiff Othman bin Din Plaintiff Ridwan Rodrigues bin Abdullah Plaintiff Roslan bin Othman Plaintiff Rosmini binti Mat Nawi Plaintiff Rosnie Ak Lale Plaintiff Saifullah bin Saliman Plaintiff Shahnoor Rudy Asmara bin Md.abbas Plaintiff Syuhari bin Saipul Plaintiff Tukiran bin Hayat Plaintiff
Case Significance
1. ) Abdul Halim Bin Mubarak 2. ) Abeha B. Mohd Yasin 3. ) Aini Bt Hamid 4. )... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 15, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-267-05-2022). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.
Key issues: [4] This Court awarded damages in lieu of one month’s notice amounting to RM63,952.53 as per the calculation in Schedule A based on the basic salary of the Plaintiffs..
What was the outcome of 1. ) Abdul Halim Bin Mubarak 2. ) Abeha B. Mohd Yasin 3. ) Aini Bt Hamid 4. )...?
1. ) Abdul Halim Bin Mubarak 2. ) Abeha B. Mohd Yasin 3. ) Aini Bt Hamid 4. )... is a High Court decision dated July 15, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.