M

Mark Saw Khay Liang

Person 1 case

Mark Saw Khay Liang appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

pa-22ncvc-60-03-2021
1. ) MARK SAW KHAY LIANG 2. ) CHARMAINE SAW CHIN PUAY v ANDREW SAW KHAY CHI
MYHC 3 November 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Mark Saw Khay Liang

Mark Saw Khay Liang appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning November 2025 to November 2025. Mark Saw Khay Liang appeared as plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Mark Saw Khay Liang?

Mark Saw Khay Liang appears in 1 published judgment from November 2025 to November 2025. Most commonly as plaintiff (1 cases).

Practice Areas

1. This suit is about two Wills. The deceased testator (Father) wrote a Will in March 2014 (2014 Will). Under the 2014 Will, Father bequeathed (gave) the family home at No. 1 Jalan Scott, Penang, as well as his watches and jewellery to his younger daughter: the Second Plaintiff (Charmaine), and his residuary estate (the rest of his assets) to his wife (Mother). 1 2. But if Mother predeceased (died before) him, Father gave his residuary estate to his four children in equal shares. 1 3. The other three children are the First Plaintiff: the elder son (Mark), the Defendant: the younger son (Andrew), and the elder daughter: Samantha, who is not a party to this suit. 1 4. In this suit, the most pertinent asset is Father’s 20,000 shares in the family’s company: Tai Chuan Realty Sdn Bhd (Tai Chuan). These Tai Chuan shares are a part of Father’s residuary estate. 1 5. Under the 2014 Will, if Mother predeceased Father, then Father’s 20,000 shares in Tai Chuan would have been shared among the four children equally. Each of them would have inherited 5,000 shares. 6. Mother passed away in July 2014. 1 7. Later, in 2017, Father wrote another Will (2017 Will). The 2017 Will was different to the 2014 Will. Under the 2017 Will, the family home was still given to Charmaine. That has not changed. But the watches and jewellery were given to Mark and Andrew. 1 8. More importantly, Father’s 20,000 Tai Chuan shares were specifically given to Andrew only. This would make Andrew the single biggest shareholder in Tai Chuan among the siblings. 1 9. This change in Father’s Will is the subject of Mark’s and Charmaine’s grievance. 1

Plaintiff (1)