E

Eddee Dzulkarnein bin Zaharudin

Person 1 case

Eddee Dzulkarnein bin Zaharudin appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

wa-22ncc-396-06-2024
AMBANK (M) BERHAD v 1. ) HIGAIN VENTURES SDN BHD 2. ) LX MODE (M) SDN BHD 3. ) ZAHARUDIN BIN ZAINOL RASHID 4. ) EDDEE DZULKARNEIN BIN ZAHARUDIN
MYHC 16 April 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Eddee Dzulkarnein bin Zaharudin

Eddee Dzulkarnein bin Zaharudin appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning April 2025 to April 2025. Eddee Dzulkarnein bin Zaharudin appeared as defendant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Eddee Dzulkarnein bin Zaharudin?

Eddee Dzulkarnein bin Zaharudin appears in 1 published judgment from April 2025 to April 2025. Most commonly as defendant (1 cases).

Practice Areas

summary judgment application-In an Order 14 application the burden of proof to show a triable issue is on the defendants-The burden of proof to show a triable issue is on the defendants. It is not enough for the defendants to make bare allegations or give a mere general denial of a debt-If an alleged triable issue is contradicted or inconsistent with contemporaneous documents the defendant’s alleged triable issue must be rejected-Certificate of Indebtedness-A certificate of indebtedness issued in accordance with the express provisions of the contract which provide that the certificate is final and conclusive of the matters stated therein is final and conclusive evidence of the amount in the absence of any manifest error on the certificate; and-The plaintiff has no further obligation to produce statements of account to prove the debt in an application for summary judgment-The certificate of indebtedness was not issued in accordance with the express provisions of the contract. An instances of non-compliance would be when the certificate of indebtedness was not signed by an officer of the plaintiff as stated in the contract; or-There is a manifest error in respect of the amounts stated on the certificate of indebtedness; or-There is fraud. 1

Defendant (1)

wa-22ncc-396-06-2024 MYHC
AMBANK (M) BERHAD v 1. ) HIGAIN VENTURES SDN BHD 2. ) LX MODE (M) SDN BHD 3. ) ZAHARUDIN BIN ZAINOL RASHID 4. ) EDDEE DZULKARNEIN BIN ZAHARUDIN
16 April 2025