D

Delvinder Singh Mann a/l Manjit Singh

Person 1 case

Delvinder Singh Mann a/l Manjit Singh appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

ba-28jm-18-08-2024
ACE HOLDINGS BERHAD PENCELAH 1. ) KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA 2 BERHAD 2. ) MOHD NADZRI BIN ZAINAL ABIDIN 3. ) DATUK FAIZAN BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 4. ) NABISHAH BINTI MOHAMAD 5. ) KOPERASI TELEKOM PAHANG BERHAD 6. ) ZARINA BINTI AHMAD 7. ) ZAMIL BIN AHMAD 8. ) ARINDERPREET KAUR A/P MANJIT SINGH 9. ) JASBIR KAUR A/P MITT SINGH 10. ) TIJWANT SINGH A/L JARNAIL SINGH 11. ) DELVINDER SINGH MANN A/L MANJIT SINGH 12. ) MANJIT SINGH A/L DELBARA SINGH 13. ) HALIMAH BINTI MUHABAH 14. ) ROKAYAH BINTI M...
MYHC 10 April 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Delvinder Singh Mann a/l Manjit Singh

Delvinder Singh Mann a/l Manjit Singh appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning April 2025 to April 2025. Delvinder Singh Mann a/l Manjit Singh appeared as intervener in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Delvinder Singh Mann a/l Manjit Singh?

Delvinder Singh Mann a/l Manjit Singh appears in 1 published judgment from April 2025 to April 2025. Most commonly as intervener (1 cases).

Practice Areas

Leave to intervene in judicial management proceeding-Section 410(c) Companies Act 2016-application to strike out JM application-whether proposed interveners are entitled to intervene in the JM application-whether JM application should be struct out at this stage-whether leave to be granted-basis to intervene-creditors of the company with existing or pending legal claims-the outcome of the JM application will affect their rights and remedies-Applicant contends that unsecured creditors are not entitled to intervene or be heard in JM applications-relied on Desa Tiasa case-proposed intervener argued that Desa Tiasa has no binding effect as it has no written judgment-appellate court decision which has not supported by written grounds cannot be treated as binding precedent-a number of High Court decisions allowed unsecured creditors to intervene in JM application-no provision in the CA 2016 or the Companies (Corporate Rescue Mechanism) Rules 2018 that limits intervention to unsecured creditors-the nature of JM application justifies access to affected parties-reinforced the objectives of JM application-each proposed interveners has a legitimate legal interest in the outcome of the JM application-rights of creditors-whether secured or unsecured-clearly affected by the outcome of the JM application-proposed interveners are allowed to intervene in the JM application-striking out application will be dealt with the JM application. 1

Intervener (1)

ba-28jm-18-08-2024 MYHC
ACE HOLDINGS BERHAD PENCELAH 1. ) KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA 2 BERHAD 2. ) MOHD NADZRI BIN ZAINAL ABIDIN 3. ) DATUK FAIZAN BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 4. ) NABISHAH BINTI MOHAMAD 5. ) KOPERASI TELEKOM PAHANG BERHAD 6. ) ZARINA BINTI AHMAD 7. ) ZAMIL BIN AHMAD 8. ) ARINDERPREET KAUR A/P MANJIT SINGH 9. ) JASBIR KAUR A/P MITT SINGH 10. ) TIJWANT SINGH A/L JARNAIL SINGH 11. ) DELVINDER SINGH MANN A/L MANJIT SINGH 12. ) MANJIT SINGH A/L DELBARA SINGH 13. ) HALIMAH BINTI MUHABAH 14. ) ROKAYAH BINTI M...
10 April 2025