D

Datuk Faizan bin Abdul Rahman

Person 1 case

Datuk Faizan bin Abdul Rahman appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:

ba-28jm-18-08-2024
ACE HOLDINGS BERHAD PENCELAH 1. ) KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA 2 BERHAD 2. ) MOHD NADZRI BIN ZAINAL ABIDIN 3. ) DATUK FAIZAN BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 4. ) NABISHAH BINTI MOHAMAD 5. ) KOPERASI TELEKOM PAHANG BERHAD 6. ) ZARINA BINTI AHMAD 7. ) ZAMIL BIN AHMAD 8. ) ARINDERPREET KAUR A/P MANJIT SINGH 9. ) JASBIR KAUR A/P MITT SINGH 10. ) TIJWANT SINGH A/L JARNAIL SINGH 11. ) DELVINDER SINGH MANN A/L MANJIT SINGH 12. ) MANJIT SINGH A/L DELBARA SINGH 13. ) HALIMAH BINTI MUHABAH 14. ) ROKAYAH BINTI M...
MYHC 10 April 2025

See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

About Datuk Faizan bin Abdul Rahman

Datuk Faizan bin Abdul Rahman appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning April 2025 to April 2025. Datuk Faizan bin Abdul Rahman appeared as intervener in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve Datuk Faizan bin Abdul Rahman?

Datuk Faizan bin Abdul Rahman appears in 1 published judgment from April 2025 to April 2025. Most commonly as intervener (1 cases).

Practice Areas

Leave to intervene in judicial management proceeding-Section 410(c) Companies Act 2016-application to strike out JM application-whether proposed interveners are entitled to intervene in the JM application-whether JM application should be struct out at this stage-whether leave to be granted-basis to intervene-creditors of the company with existing or pending legal claims-the outcome of the JM application will affect their rights and remedies-Applicant contends that unsecured creditors are not entitled to intervene or be heard in JM applications-relied on Desa Tiasa case-proposed intervener argued that Desa Tiasa has no binding effect as it has no written judgment-appellate court decision which has not supported by written grounds cannot be treated as binding precedent-a number of High Court decisions allowed unsecured creditors to intervene in JM application-no provision in the CA 2016 or the Companies (Corporate Rescue Mechanism) Rules 2018 that limits intervention to unsecured creditors-the nature of JM application justifies access to affected parties-reinforced the objectives of JM application-each proposed interveners has a legitimate legal interest in the outcome of the JM application-rights of creditors-whether secured or unsecured-clearly affected by the outcome of the JM application-proposed interveners are allowed to intervene in the JM application-striking out application will be dealt with the JM application. 1

Intervener (1)

ba-28jm-18-08-2024 MYHC
ACE HOLDINGS BERHAD PENCELAH 1. ) KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA 2 BERHAD 2. ) MOHD NADZRI BIN ZAINAL ABIDIN 3. ) DATUK FAIZAN BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 4. ) NABISHAH BINTI MOHAMAD 5. ) KOPERASI TELEKOM PAHANG BERHAD 6. ) ZARINA BINTI AHMAD 7. ) ZAMIL BIN AHMAD 8. ) ARINDERPREET KAUR A/P MANJIT SINGH 9. ) JASBIR KAUR A/P MITT SINGH 10. ) TIJWANT SINGH A/L JARNAIL SINGH 11. ) DELVINDER SINGH MANN A/L MANJIT SINGH 12. ) MANJIT SINGH A/L DELBARA SINGH 13. ) HALIMAH BINTI MUHABAH 14. ) ROKAYAH BINTI M...
10 April 2025