C
Chong Boon Kiong
Person 1 case
Chong Boon Kiong appeared as a party in the following Malaysia court case:
ba-22ncvc-385-09-2023
1. ) LIM JOO SWEE 2. ) LEONG ENG KEONG 3. ) CHONG BOON KIONG 4. ) Cheah Kim Looi (Menyaman untuk dan bagi pihak kesemua 99 tuan punya dan pemilik Selangor Polo Residency dan ahli-ahli Persatuan Penduduk dan Pemilik Pusat Polo & Ekuestrian Selangor, Kota Damansara) v 1. ) Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor (PKNS) 2. ) SELANGOR POLO SDN. BHD. 3. ) SELANGOR COUNTRY CLUB SDN. BHD. 4. ) MAYANG TIASA SDN. BHD. 5. ) DATUK BANDAR MAJLIS BANDARAYA PETALING JAYA
MYHC 27 February 2025
See the full case for complete details including judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.
About Chong Boon Kiong
Chong Boon Kiong appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning February 2025 to February 2025. Chong Boon Kiong appeared as plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).
How many court cases involve Chong Boon Kiong?
Chong Boon Kiong appears in 1 published judgment from February 2025 to February 2025. Most commonly as plaintiff (1 cases).
Practice Areas
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out-Application pleads sub-paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of O.18 r.19 cumulatively- Whether application is void or ineffective because multiple limbs pleaded together 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out- Action- Action arising from dismissal of earlier objections and judicial review proceedings- Res judicata-Allegation that the present action mirrors those previously raised and adjudicated during the Appeal Board Hearing and subsequent High Court judicial review-Whether causes of action similar-Whether parties similar-Whether matters and issues in the present action ventilated in previous proceedings- Whether case caught by res judicata 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out- Action-Cause of action premised on alleged breach of contract, misrepresentation and negligence-Time barred-No fresh breach pleaded-Whether six-year limitation period already sets in-Limitation Act 1953; s.6(1) 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out- Action- 4th defendant, an original purchaser, not a party to SPA involving the Plaintiffs-Whether there is duty of care- Whether sufficient legal proximity between parties 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out-Action-5th defendant, a local planning authority without the power to approve rezoning or change in land-Whether plaintiffs‘ claim discloses reasonable cause of action against 5th defendant- Whether plaintiffs‘ claim against 5th defendant has procedural impropriety pursuant to O.53 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out- Action-Cause of action- Plaintiffs merely adjacent landowners- Whether plaintiffs have any legal interest or rights to object to the change of land use- Whether Plaintiffs have registered interest, statutory lien, leasehold or easement over the lot- Limited procedural rights to adjacent landowners at specific stage-Town and Country Planning Act 1976; s.13(2); s.21(6) 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Pleadings-Issue not pleaded-Cause of action tort of nuisance, but failed to identify specific act of nuisance occurred-Plaintiff’s claim unparticularised and speculative 1 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Representative action- Requirements- Whether prerequisites for a representative action satisfied- Whether pleading disclosed the harm complained of was uniformly suffered -Whether reliefs sought beneficial to all class member-Rules of Court 2012; O.15 r.12 1