A

Aminah binti Ahmad

Person 4 cases

About Aminah binti Ahmad

Aminah binti Ahmad appears as a party in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning June 2023 to April 2025. Aminah binti Ahmad appeared as respondent in 2 cases, aggrieved party in 1 case, applicant in 1 case. Cases span the Federal Court (2), High Court (2).

How many court cases involve Aminah binti Ahmad?

Aminah binti Ahmad appears in 4 published judgments from June 2023 to April 2025. Most commonly as respondent (2 cases).

Practice Areas

A declaration that amendments to ss. 3 and 6 of the Pension Adjustment Act 1980 contravenes Art. 147 of the Federal Constitution (brought by ss. 3 and 7 of the PAA 2013) 1 1. Bank's duty: investigate illegality in SPA. 2. Bona fide qualification under S.340(3) NLC. 3. Bank's due diligence: prior transactions. 4. Burden of proof: valuable consideration, subsequent purchasers. 5. Conflicting good faith decisions: S.340(3) NLC. 1 Leave to intervene in judicial management proceeding-Section 410(c) Companies Act 2016-application to strike out JM application-whether proposed interveners are entitled to intervene in the JM application-whether JM application should be struct out at this stage-whether leave to be granted-basis to intervene-creditors of the company with existing or pending legal claims-the outcome of the JM application will affect their rights and remedies-Applicant contends that unsecured creditors are not entitled to intervene or be heard in JM applications-relied on Desa Tiasa case-proposed intervener argued that Desa Tiasa has no binding effect as it has no written judgment-appellate court decision which has not supported by written grounds cannot be treated as binding precedent-a number of High Court decisions allowed unsecured creditors to intervene in JM application-no provision in the CA 2016 or the Companies (Corporate Rescue Mechanism) Rules 2018 that limits intervention to unsecured creditors-the nature of JM application justifies access to affected parties-reinforced the objectives of JM application-each proposed interveners has a legitimate legal interest in the outcome of the JM application-rights of creditors-whether secured or unsecured-clearly affected by the outcome of the JM application-proposed interveners are allowed to intervene in the JM application-striking out application will be dealt with the JM application. 1 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial Review 1

Aggrieved Party (1)

ba-28jm-18-08-2024 MYHC

ACE HOLDINGS BERHAD PENCELAH 1. ) KOPERASI PERMODALAN FELDA MALAYSIA 2 BERHAD 2. ) MOHD NADZRI BIN ZAINAL ABIDIN 3. ) DATUK FAIZAN BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 4. ) NABISHAH BINTI MOHAMAD 5. ) KOPERASI TELEKOM PAHANG BERHAD 6. ) ZARINA BINTI AHMAD 7. ) ZAMIL BIN AHMAD 8. ) ARINDERPREET KAUR A/P MANJIT SINGH 9. ) JASBIR KAUR A/P MITT SINGH 10. ) TIJWANT SINGH A/L JARNAIL SINGH 11. ) DELVINDER SINGH MANN A/L MANJIT SINGH 12. ) MANJIT SINGH A/L DELBARA SINGH 13. ) HALIMAH BINTI MUHABAH 14. ) ROKAYAH BINTI M...

Applicant (1)

wa-25-15-01-2024 MYHC

AMINAH BINTI AHMAD v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) Ketua Pengarah Perkhidmatan Awam

15 January 2025

Respondent (2)

02f-5-03-2024j MYFC

MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD v 1. ) Mohd Affandi Bin Ahmad 2. ) Aminah Binti Ahmad

01f-26-06-2022w MYFC

1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) Ketua Pengarah Perkhidmatan Awam v Aminah Binti Ahmad (menyaman dalam kapasiti peribadi dan bagi pihak 56 ahli-ahli yang telah bersara daripada perkhidmatan awam)