TSR BINA Sdn Bhd
About TSR BINA Sdn Bhd
TSR BINA Sdn Bhd appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2025–2026). TSR BINA Sdn Bhd is recorded as Respondent (1), Applicant (1) and Plaintiff (1). These cases were heard before MYHC (3).
On the court record
A company litigating the enforcement of court undertakings through contempt and veil-piercing, summary disposal, and the setting aside of an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act 2005.
TSR Bina Sdn Bhd appears in the corpus in a contempt-and-undertaking matter, a summary-disposal application, and the setting aside of an arbitral award.
One matter concerned an undertaking given to the court and recorded in a consent order, where an undertaking by directors of a company amounted to a personal undertaking. The court held that an undertaking given to the court has the same force as an injunction, that breach of the undertaking is misconduct amounting to contempt, and that the corporate veil was irrelevant, applying the evasion principle so that the veil could be pierced to impose liability on directors who gave a personal undertaking, and treating the matter as a clear-cut case suitable for summary judgment.
A second matter concerned an application by a defendant to summarily dispose of the plaintiff's action after the close of pleadings by a question of law. The plaintiff opposed the application, contending that various disputed facts meant the claims could be determined only after a full trial, so the proceeding turned on whether the dispute was suitable for summary disposal or required a trial.
A third matter concerned an application to set aside an arbitral award on the ground that it was made in breach of the rules of natural justice and was therefore contrary to the public policy of Malaysia, the plaintiff contending that the final award contained decisions beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration. The court held that the complaints were in substance challenges to the merits of the arbitral findings and did not establish any breach of natural justice or excess of jurisdiction, and dismissed the application to set aside the award.
These proceedings show a company litigating the enforcement of undertakings through contempt and veil-piercing, summary disposal, and the finality of an arbitral award. Outcomes are stated only as recorded.
How many Malaysia court cases involve TSR BINA Sdn Bhd?
TSR BINA Sdn Bhd appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2025–2026).
Which courts does TSR BINA Sdn Bhd appear in?
TSR BINA Sdn Bhd appears before MYHC (3).
What did the court hold about the personal undertaking?
That an undertaking given to the court has the same force as an injunction, that its breach is contempt, and that the corporate veil could be pierced under the evasion principle to impose liability on directors who gave the undertaking.
Why was the application to set aside the arbitral award dismissed?
The court held that the complaints were in substance challenges to the merits of the arbitral findings and did not establish any breach of natural justice or excess of jurisdiction.