T
Temasek Blooms Sdn Bhd
Organisation 2 cases
About Temasek Blooms Sdn Bhd
Temasek Blooms Sdn Bhd appears as a party in 2 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning February 2025 to February 2026. Temasek Blooms Sdn Bhd appeared as defendant in 1 case, respondent in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (2).
How many court cases involve Temasek Blooms Sdn Bhd?
Temasek Blooms Sdn Bhd appears in 2 published judgments from February 2025 to February 2026. Most commonly as defendant (1 cases).
Practice Areas
This case concerns an application to stay execution of an Order for Sale granted under the National Land Code 1965. The validity of the Order was not challenged. The sole issue was whether the defendant had established special or exceptional circumstances to justify a stay. 1 The court reaffirmed that a stay of execution is discretionary and that a successful litigant is entitled to the fruits of judgment. Relying on Kosma Palm Oil Mill Sdn Bhd v Koperasi Serbaguna Makmur Bhd and Ming Ann Holdings Sdn Bhd v Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd, the court held that speculative restructuring efforts, a non-binding Term Sheet, and alleged commercial prejudice to tenants do not amount to special circumstances. 1 As no concrete evidence of imminent redemption or secured funding was shown, the application was dismissed. The decision underscores the high threshold required to stay execution once a chargee’s statutory right to realise its security has crystallised. 1 Key Words 1 Stay of execution; Order for Sale; National Land Code 1965; special circumstances; chargee’s rights; foreclosure; fruits of judgment. 1 Civil procedure 1