TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD
About TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD
TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2025). TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD is recorded as Plaintiff (2) and Applicant (1). These cases were heard before MYHC (3).
On the court record
A general takaful operator litigating the validity and scope of motor cover under the Road Transport Act 1987 and the reach of insurance subrogation.
Takaful Ikhlas General Berhad appears in the corpus as a general takaful operator in coverage and subrogation disputes arising from motor and property claims.
One matter, framed in Bahasa Malaysia, was an originating summons in which the operator sought declarations that a motor policy issued in a third respondent's name was void or unenforceable, described as never having come into existence or void ab initio, and that it was not liable under the policy for an accident, nor liable under section 96(1) of the Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 (the Road Transport Act 1987) to satisfy any judgment obtained against the insured parties in the related Sessions Court civil suit. The application was supported by an affidavit affirmed by the operator's Vice President of the Claims Division.
A second matter, also framed in Bahasa Malaysia, concerned an application to enter final judgment on the question whether the operator, as insurer, was liable for an accident. The operator denied liability by reference to a cover note showing a date and time, while the third defendant relied on the policy schedule showing only the date on which the policy took effect, putting the timing of cover in issue.
A third matter concerned an application to strike out under Order 18 rule 19 of the Rules of Court 2012, engaging insurance subrogation and whether insurers had locus standi to sue in their own name, whether subrogation rights were validly exercised against a non-tortfeasor, and questions of a landlord's duty of care, vicarious liability and res judicata in a claim arising from a fire.
These proceedings show a takaful operator litigating the validity and scope of motor cover and the reach of subrogation. The narrative reports the statutory provisions and the issues the courts identified, refers to natural persons by their role, and states outcomes only as recorded.
How many Malaysia court cases involve TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD?
TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD appears in 3 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2025).
Which courts does TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD appear in?
TAKAFUL IKHLAS GENERAL BERHAD appears before MYHC (3).
What did the operator seek in the void ab initio matter?
Declarations that a motor policy was void or unenforceable and that the operator was not liable under it, nor liable under section 96(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 to satisfy any judgment obtained against the insured parties.
What subrogation questions did the strike-out matter raise?
Whether insurers had locus standi to sue in their own name, whether subrogation rights were validly exercised against a non-tortfeasor, and questions of a landlord's duty of care and vicarious liability arising from a fire.