P
Perbadanan Putrajaya
Organisation 3 cases
About Perbadanan Putrajaya
Perbadanan Putrajaya appears as a party in 3 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning July 2025 to July 2025. Perbadanan Putrajaya appeared as applicant in 2 cases, respondent in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (3).
How many court cases involve Perbadanan Putrajaya?
Perbadanan Putrajaya appears in 3 published judgments from July 2025 to July 2025. Most commonly as applicant (2 cases).
Practice Areas
Enclosure 1. In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya (“PP”) had applied to this court under section 15 (b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10.1.2025 (“AD”) given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd (“DRSB”). We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to section 16 CIPAA. Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with section 28 CIPAA. 4 All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this Court. 1 Enclosure 1. In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya (“PP”) had applied to this court under section 15 (b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10.1.2025 (“AD”) given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd (“DRSB”). We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to section 16 CIPAA. Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with section 28 CIPAA. All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this Court. 1 Enclosusre 1. In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya (“PP”) had applied to this court under section 15 (b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10.1.2025 (“AD”) given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd (“DRSB”). We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to section 16 CIPAA. Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with section 28 CIPAA. All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this Court. 1