P

PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR

Organisation 8 cases

About PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR

PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR appears as a party in 8 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning February 2025 to November 2025. PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR appeared as defendant in 4 cases, respondent in 3 cases, appellant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (6), Court of Appeal (2).

How many court cases involve PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR?

PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR appears in 8 published judgments from February 2025 to November 2025. Most commonly as defendant (4 cases).

In which Malaysian courts has PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR appeared?

PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR has appeared across High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (6 cases) and Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) (2 cases), totaling 8 judgments.

Practice Areas

The appeals arose from a High Court judgment in a land fraud case. The High Court found against Lee Chee Boon, Tang Ser Chiew, John Henry Louis, and Messrs. John & Associates (Appeal No. 481), as well as the Land Registry and its relevant officers (Appeal No. 480), for their involvement in the fraudulent transfer of land belonging to Hee Yan Choong to Ooh Tong Hai and Goh Hui Li. The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s findings, holding the Land Registry negligent and Lee, Tang, John, and John & Associates complicit in the fraudulent transaction. 2 Imposter: fraudulent transfer of land 1 Land fraud- fictitious person using non-existent IC no applied for name change from name of registered proprietor (deceased) to another name-land office allowed the change without requesting for IC-no evidence of original title furnished for the transaction-after name change, land was transferred to D1 who then sold land to D3 and D4-D1 also sold land to D2-land was then registered in D2’s name-when D3 and D4 knew of the registration, sought for specific performance of the SPA entered with D1-court allowed the specific performance and ordered land be re-transferred to D1 to give effect to the specific performance order-administrator of estate of deceased came to know of land fraud-sued D1 to D4-sued Land Administrator also for negligence and breach of statutory duties-whether D1 can obtain good title from fraudster who has no title-whether D1 and D2 were privy to the fraud-whether D3 and D4 can claim any interest in the land-whether D3 and D4 can raise res judicata re entitlement to land as specific performance had been granted them-whether the evidence establishes negligence and breach of statutory duties-whether defence of s.22 of National Land Code avails Land Administrator. 1 TATACARA SIVIL: Permohonan membatalkan Writ dan Pernyataan Tuntutan 1 PERLEMBAGAAN PERSEKUTUAN: Pemisahan bidang kuasa Sivil dan Syariah 1 Permohonan untuk membatalkan Kaveat Pendaftar. Plaintif tidak mematuhi prosedur yang diperuntukkan di bawah KTN. Ketiadaan keputusan yang boleh dirayu di bawah seksyen 418, adalah suatu kecacatan bidang kuasa yang menghalang Mahkamah ini daripada melayan permohonan Plaintif. Kaveat Pendaftar telah dimasukkan secara sah dan kekal berkuatkuasa. Permohonan ditolak dengan kos. 1 Section 329 National Land Code 1 Striking Out Order is a final order which renders this Court functus officio, and the Court does not have the power to set aside its own final Order 1

Respondent (3)

Appellant (1)

Defendant (4)