Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah
About Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah
Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah appears in 4 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2026). Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah is recorded as Respondent (3) and Defendant (1). These cases were heard before MYHC (4).
On the court record
A district land office whose matters study the enforceability of a public duty to decide on re-alienation and variation of land use, the availability of mandamus, and compensation in land references.
Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah (the District and Land Office) appears in the corpus as a public-authority respondent in land-administration and judicial-review matters, and its appearances centre on the exercise of statutory powers under the National Land Code. In a High Court matter framed partly in English, the court addressed a forfeiture for non-payment of quit rent and an application to compel a decision on a request for re-alienation, considering whether the State Authority was under a statutory duty to consider and communicate a decision on an application for re-alienation under section 133(3) of the National Land Code, whether that discretionary power gave rise to an enforceable public duty, and whether mandamus lay to compel it.
In further matters the office was a respondent in judicial-review challenges to a land administrator's decisions — for example, a decision not to vary land use or to amend the syarat nyata (express conditions) of a title under section 124 of the National Land Code despite payment of a premium — and in a matter concerning consequential orders following an earlier interim injunction in favour of a third party. In a land-reference matter framed in Bahasa Malaysia, the court, assisted by government and private assessors (pengapit), determined market value by reference to the Federal Court authority in Ng Tiou Hong.
For a reader, the cluster is a study of land-office litigation: the enforceability of a public duty to decide on re-alienation and variation of land use, the availability of mandamus, and the assessment of compensation in land references. The office and other authorities in their official capacity are named as they appear on the record; individual landowners are referred to by their procedural role only. The office's matters concentrate on the enforceability of a public authority's statutory duties under the National Land Code: whether a discretionary power to decide on re-alienation or to vary land use gives rise to an enforceable duty that mandamus can compel, and how compensation is assessed in a land reference. The recurring question is when a discretion hardens into a duty the courts will enforce.
How many Malaysia court cases involve Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah?
Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah appears in 4 reported Malaysia court cases (2024–2026).
Which courts does Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah appear in?
Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah appears before MYHC (4).
What public-duty question arose over the re-alienation request?
Whether the State Authority was under a statutory duty to consider and communicate a decision on an application for re-alienation under section 133(3) of the National Land Code, whether that discretionary power gave rise to an enforceable public duty, and whether mandamus lay to compel a decision.
What land-administration decisions were challenged by judicial review?
Decisions of a land administrator, including a refusal to vary land use or to amend the express conditions (syarat nyata) of a title under section 124 of the National Land Code despite payment of a premium.