M
Malaysia Airports Sdn Bhd
Organisation 4 cases
About Malaysia Airports Sdn Bhd
Malaysia Airports Sdn Bhd appears as a party in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning January 2025 to September 2025. Malaysia Airports Sdn Bhd appeared as defendant in 2 cases, appellant in 1 case, applicant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (4).
How many court cases involve Malaysia Airports Sdn Bhd?
Malaysia Airports Sdn Bhd appears in 4 published judgments from January 2025 to September 2025. Most commonly as defendant (2 cases).
Practice Areas
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION 1 Whether the defendant, as the landlord, can impose additional terms to prevent the plaintiff from conducting business-to-business (B2B) transactions at the FCS, TS, and FC after the tenancy has commenced 1 TORT KECUAIAN: Tuntutan gantirugi terhadap defendan-defendan berikutan kemalangan pada 9.7.2018 yang mengakibatkan plaintif mengalami kecacatan kekal. Defendan pertama dilantik oleh defendan kedua kerja-kerja pengorekan dan pengalihan tanah berdekatan Jalan Pekeliling KM8.4 KLIA. Defendan Kedua adalah anak syarikat milikan penuh defendan ketiga. Defendan Kedua meletakkan penghadang jalan di laluan km 8.4 dan berlaku kemalangan akibat motorsikal yang ditunggang oleh Pihak Ketiga merempuh penghadang tersebut dan mengakibatkan kecederaan kepada plaintif, pembonceng motorsikal 1 UNDANG-UNDANG KETERANGAN: Beban bukti terletak di bahu plaintif untuk membuktikan tuntutannya 1 Conclusion 1 The Company failed to explore other disciplinary options that would have been suitable for the misconduct displayed by the Respondent. These alternatives could have included measures such as suspension without pay, a reduction in salary, or even demotion. As a result of this oversight, the dismissal of the Respondent cannot be considered to have just cause or proper justification. This Court finds that the company has failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the Claimant was dismissed from his job or employment with just cause or excuse. 1 Therefore: (1) the Claimant appeal is allowed in part where the deduction to back wages due to contributory conduct of 10% ordered in the Industrial Court's Award No. 188 of 2025 is increased to 30%; and; (2) No order as to costs. 1 This Court’s assessment 12 This Court was unable to accept the Defendant’s reasons to convert the OS into a writ action because the factual matrix is not disputed. The Tenancy Agreement and the clauses contained therein, the fact that the Defendant uses POS System and LMS to record transactions of the Lounge, and also that the Defendant had failed to provide the documents sought by the Plaintiff. 1
Applicant (1)
Defendant (2)
ba-23ncvc-54-11-2022 MYHC
Muhammad Amirul Ashwad Bin Nazrul Ishsam v 1. ) CCP Builders Sdn Bhd 2. ) Malaysia Airports (Sepang) Sdn Bhd 3. ) Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad PIHAK KETIGA Mohamad Zhafran Bin Mohamad Taufik BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK Jabatan Peguam Negara
30 July 2025
ba-22ncvc-290-07-2024 MYHC
PLAZA PREMIUM LOUNGE MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. v MALAYSIA AIRPORTS (SEPANG) SDN. BHD.
16 January 2025