LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN

Organisation 3 cases

About LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN

LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN appears as a party in 3 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning January 2025 to December 2025. LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN appeared as respondent in 3 cases. Cases span the High Court (3).

How many court cases involve LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN?

LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN appears in 3 published judgments from January 2025 to December 2025. Most commonly as respondent (3 cases).

Practice Areas

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review 1 The Applicant applied for judicial review under O.53 RC 2012. Leave was granted on 17.08.2023. The Applicant applied for: (i) A declaration or certiorari order quashing the decision of the Respondents in dismissing the Applicant on the basis that the decision was illegal and invalid (ii) A Mandamus to compel the Respondents to clear the applicant's service record and for his reinstatement together with back wages. (iii) Other reliefs and costs. 2 On 14.01.2025, I find that the Applicant has failed to prove his case, and I dismissed the Applicant’s Judicial Review application with no order for costs. 1 Dismissal from police force-Applicant issued show cause in respect of 2 charges-representations made-before making decision, the 1st Respondent as Disciplinary Board revoked the show cause and issued a another show cause comprising 6 charges-Applicant made representations-1st Respondent found Applicant failed to exculpate himself-imposed punishment of dismissal for 2 charges-the decision is tainted with procedural impropriety as the 1st Respondent ought to considered the representations in respect of 1st show cause instead of revoking-whether the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 allows for revocation of show cause-whether the punishment imposed is disproportionate to the disciplinary offence-whether there is a duty to give reasons when informing the Applicant of the decision to dismiss him 1

Respondent (3)

ka-25-22-12-2023 MYHC

MUHAMMAD FIRDAUS BIN ZAILANI v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN 3. ) KETUA POLIS NEGARA, MALAYSIA 4. ) KETUA POLIS NEGERI KEDAH 5. ) Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM)

16 December 2025

wa-25-358-11-2023 MYHC

MOHAMMAD HANIF BIN ADENAN v 1. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN 2. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

30 November 2025

wa-25-182-07-2023 MYHC

MUHAMAD IZWAN BIN MAZLAN v 1. ) ACP MOHD AMAR BIN MOHAJIN (PENGERUSI LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA 2. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

13 January 2025