K
KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL
Organisation 5 cases
About KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL
KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL appears as a party in 5 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning January 2025 to December 2025. KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL appeared as respondent in 3 cases, appellant in 2 cases. Cases span the High Court (5).
How many court cases involve KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL?
KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL appears in 5 published judgments from January 2025 to December 2025. Most commonly as respondent (3 cases).
Practice Areas
This is an appeal against the decision of the Social Security Appellate Board (SSAB) dated 29.11.2024 wherein they allowed the Respondent's appeal for temporary disablement benefits. The Respondent suffered a sports injury when he took part in a futsal competition organised by the employer. Issue was whether that injury was an employment injury. 1 Appeal against Social Security Appellant Board's decision dated 23.11.2023 which dismissed the Appellant's claim for invalidity pension. The medical board and appellate medical board had already decided that the Appellant does not qualify for the pension. The SSAB does not have the jurisdiction to review the medical board and/or the appellate medical board's decision. 1 Rayuan terhadap keputusan Jemaah Rayuan Keselamatan Social yang mengtakrifkan kecederaan yang dialami Responden suatu bencana kerja. Kecederaan itu tidak menepati elemen-elemen yang dihuraikan dalam takrifan bencana kerja. 1 This is the Plaintiff’s application for an extension of time to file an appeal against the decision of the Social Security Appellate Board (“SSAB”) rendered on 4 December 2018. The Plaintiff only filed her Originating Summons on 28 August 2024, a staggering 5 years and 8 months after the SSAB's decision. While it is undisputed that the Plaintiff has the right to appeal under the law, the law clearly stipulates that any such appeal must be filed within 60 days of the decision. To say that the Plaintiff has slept on her rights is an understatement. It appears that she has effectively "put her case to sleep," having made no effort whatsoever to assert her legal rights within the prescribed timeframe. This extraordinary delay reflects a flagrant disregard for procedural rules and a complete failure to exercise even the most rudimentary level of diligence. 1 Nevertheless, it was still contended by the Plaintiff before this Court that her application for an extension of time ought to be allowed and predictably, the Defendant has urged this Court to dismiss the Plaintiff’s application. 1 For the record, this Court is also very sympathetic to the health condition and hardship experienced by the Appellant, but the provisions of law are clear. After considering both parties' submissions and the SOCSO Appellate Board’s Grounds of Judgment dated 17.06.2025, this Court finds that the reasons and facts of the entire case justifies the conclusion set forth below: 1 (i) the Social Security Appellate Board did not make an appealable error; and 1 (ii) the appeal is dismissed without costs and the decision of the Social Security Appellate Board is hereby upheld. 1
Appellant (2)
Respondent (3)
ba-16-7-01-2024 MYHC
MANOGAR A/L M RAHMAN v KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL
6 November 2025
pa-16-7-04-2025 MYHC
ANG KEE CHYE v KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL
9 September 2025
ba-24ncvc-1863-08-2024 MYHC
SIM FOO YOKE v KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL
8 January 2025