K
KERJAYA PROSPEK Sdn Bhd
Organisation 5 cases
About KERJAYA PROSPEK Sdn Bhd
KERJAYA PROSPEK Sdn Bhd appears as a party in 5 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning August 2025 to December 2025. KERJAYA PROSPEK Sdn Bhd appeared as applicant in 2 cases, respondent in 2 cases, plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (5).
How many court cases involve KERJAYA PROSPEK Sdn Bhd?
KERJAYA PROSPEK Sdn Bhd appears in 5 published judgments from August 2025 to December 2025. Most commonly as applicant (2 cases).
Practice Areas
This is a Grounds of Judgement of both application to enforce the Adjudication Decision against Kerjaya Prospek under section 28 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act, 2012 and application to set aside the Adjudication Decision under section 15(b) and/or 15(d) of the Act. 2 This is an application by Apple 99 Development Sdn Bhd pursuant to Section 15(b) & (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 for an order to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 21.2.2025 obtained by Kerjaya Prospek (M) Sdn Bhd. 1 This is an application by Kerjaya Prospek (M) Sdn Bhd pursuant to Section 28 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 for an order to enforce the Adjudication Decision dated 9.5.2025. 1 This case concerns an application to recuse the High Court judge from further hearing the action following the Court of Appeal’s reversal of an earlier interlocutory order setting aside third party proceedings. The central issue was whether the judge’s prior findings created a real danger of bias under the “real danger of bias” test. The court held that the earlier remarks were preliminary, made at an interlocutory stage, and did not amount to a conclusive determination of the merits. Accordingly, no real danger of bias was established and the recusal application was dismissed with costs. 1