G
GAIA PLAS Sdn Bhd
Organisation 2 cases
About GAIA PLAS Sdn Bhd
GAIA PLAS Sdn Bhd appears as a party in 2 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning November 2025 to February 2026. GAIA PLAS Sdn Bhd appeared as applicant in 1 case, respondent in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (2).
How many court cases involve GAIA PLAS Sdn Bhd?
GAIA PLAS Sdn Bhd appears in 2 published judgments from November 2025 to February 2026. Most commonly as applicant (1 cases).
Practice Areas
Foreclosure Application- The Plaintiff granted several Islamic financing facilities- secured by two legal charges over the same property- The Defendant defaulted in its payment obligations-“cause to the contrary” within the meaning of section 256(3) of the NLC- Whether the Form 16D was duly served- denial of service is not supported by evidence- Whether the Form 16D is invalid for combining multiple facilities-The law does not require the chargee to issue separate notices for each charge where the property charged is the same- Whether the pending Kuala Lumpur action constitutes “cause to the contrary”- foreclosure proceedings are statutory remedies in rem- The pendency of another civil suit does not prevent the chargee from enforcing its security concurrently- the existence of a parallel proceeding is irrelevant- Defendant has not shown any of the limited grounds that would amount to “cause to the contrary” under section 256(3)- Plaintiff has complied with all statutory preconditions under sections 254 to 257 of the NLC- Plaintiff’s application for an Order for Sale of the charged property is allowed. 1 Companies 1