F
FIMA BULKING SERVICES BERHAD
Organisation 2 cases
About FIMA BULKING SERVICES BERHAD
FIMA BULKING SERVICES BERHAD appears as a party in 2 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning March 2025 to July 2025. FIMA BULKING SERVICES BERHAD appeared as aggrieved party in 1 case, plaintiff in 1 case. Cases span the Court of Appeal (1), High Court (1).
How many court cases involve FIMA BULKING SERVICES BERHAD?
FIMA BULKING SERVICES BERHAD appears in 2 published judgments from March 2025 to July 2025. Most commonly as aggrieved party (1 cases).
Practice Areas
Appeal against the decision of the High Court in allowing the application for Judicial Review filed by the Respondents to quash the decision made by the Appelant through their letters dated 23 December 2021 issued to 4 bidders offering the sale of the Used Cooking Oil seized from the 1st Respondent on 26 May 2020 1 Abstract 1 MPOB appealed the dismissal of its application to intervene in execution proceedings and stay a Writ of Seizure and Sale against Used Cooking Oil (UCO) it had seized in 2020. The judgment creditors sought to execute their default judgment for unpaid storage costs. MPOB applied to intervene one day before execution, claiming the UCO required preservation for criminal proceedings. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding: (1) execution proceedings lack jurisdiction for intervention applications; (2) MPOB failed to establish legal interest, having only commercial interests; (3) procedural violations including wrong timing and forum; and (4) MPOB was estopped by contradictory conduct, having previously attempted to sell the same UCO in 2021. The Court held that post-judgment intervention undermines litigation finality and no special circumstances warranted staying execution. 1 Keywords 1 Execution proceedings, post-judgment intervention, stay of execution 1