E

ERM REAL ESTATE SDN BERHAD

Organisation 1 case

About ERM REAL ESTATE SDN BERHAD

ERM REAL ESTATE SDN BERHAD appears as a party in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning June 2025 to June 2025. ERM REAL ESTATE SDN BERHAD appeared as respondent in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (1).

How many court cases involve ERM REAL ESTATE SDN BERHAD?

ERM REAL ESTATE SDN BERHAD appears in 1 published judgment from June 2025 to June 2025. Most commonly as respondent (1 cases).

Practice Areas

The Plaintiffs initiated this Originating Summons, on 19 December, 2023, against the Defendants named therein in their capacities as the Receivers & Managers of the Plaintiff Companies. 1 The Plaintiffs’ action is premised on Section 383(2) and the Sixth Schedule of the Companies Act 2016, on the ground that they are duty bound under the law to seek the reliefs in this case to protect the Debenture Holders 1 The issues raised in this Originating Summons are as follows: 1 (a) whether the First to Third Defendants are required to provide the Receivers and Managers with the Statement of Affairs of the Companies as at 9 November, 2023 and the requested documents and information, and surrender to the Receivers and Managers any of the Company Documents in accordance with sections 388 and 390 of the Companies Act 2016; 1 (b) whether the First to Third Defendants' failure and refusal to provide the Statement of Affairs and the requested documents and information, and to surrender the Company Documents are in breach of sections 388 and 390 of the Companies Act 2016; 1 (c) whether the Fourth Defendant is required to provide the Receivers and Managers with the relevant information relating to the Properties and deliver the Tenancy Documents to the Receivers and Managers and/or account for all or any of the monies collected from the tenants and/or remitted to the Designated Accounts; 1 (d) whether the Fifth Defendant is required to provide the Receivers and Managers with the relevant information relating to the Tenancy Agreement purportedly entered with Perodua Sales Sdn Bhd on 13 May, 2019; and 1 (e) whether the Fourth and Fifth Defendants are deemed to have renounced the business of the agency and caused the agency created to be terminated. 1

Respondent (1)