D
DAMANSARA REALTY Sdn Bhd
Organisation 4 cases
About DAMANSARA REALTY Sdn Bhd
DAMANSARA REALTY Sdn Bhd appears as a party in 4 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning June 2025 to July 2025. DAMANSARA REALTY Sdn Bhd appeared as respondent in 2 cases, applicant in 1 case, defendant in 1 case. Cases span the High Court (4).
How many court cases involve DAMANSARA REALTY Sdn Bhd?
DAMANSARA REALTY Sdn Bhd appears in 4 published judgments from June 2025 to July 2025. Most commonly as respondent (2 cases).
Practice Areas
Notice of Application seeks to strike out part of the Plaintiff’s claim as pleaded in the Writ and Statement of Claim pursuant to Order 18 Rule 19(1)(a), (b) and/or (d) of the Rules of Court 2012. application is premised on Order 18 Rule 19(1) of the ROC 2012, on the following grounds: (a) That the said claims disclose no reasonable cause of action; (b) That they are scandalous, frivolous, and/or vexatious; (c) That they are obviously unsustainable; and/or (d) That they constitute an abuse of the Court’s process. 1 The Defendant submitted that the Plaintiff failed to perform and comply with its obligations under the Term Sheet despite the Defendant having granted several extensions of time to the Plaintiff, which ultimately resulted in the Term Sheet lapsing and/or expiring. 1 Court’s power to strike out pleadings must be exercised with caution. However, where the pleadings disclose no reasonable cause of action, and are plainly inconsistent with binding contractual terms, it is the Court’s duty to prevent abuse of process. In such circumstances, the judicial discretion under Order 18 Rule 19 ROC 2012 must be exercised to ensure that only justiciable claims proceed to trial. 1 This decision does not preclude the parties from raising these issues at trial on para 40 (b) and the counterclaim, nor should it be taken as a ruling on the ultimate merit of the Plaintiff’s claims. It is simply a recognition that those matters are not suitable for summary determination. The Plaintiff’s claim under paragraph 40(b) and the Defendant’s counterclaim shall proceed to full trial. 1 Enclosure 1. In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya (“PP”) had applied to this court under section 15 (b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10.1.2025 (“AD”) given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd (“DRSB”). We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to section 16 CIPAA. Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with section 28 CIPAA. 4 All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this Court. 1 Enclosure 1. In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya (“PP”) had applied to this court under section 15 (b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10.1.2025 (“AD”) given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd (“DRSB”). We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to section 16 CIPAA. Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with section 28 CIPAA. All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this Court. 1 Enclosusre 1. In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya (“PP”) had applied to this court under section 15 (b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10.1.2025 (“AD”) given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd (“DRSB”). We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to section 16 CIPAA. Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with section 28 CIPAA. All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this Court. 1