A
AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD
Organisation 5 cases
About AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD
AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD appears as a party in 5 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning May 2019 to July 2025. AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD appeared as respondent in 3 cases, appellant in 1 case, defendant in 1 case. Cases span the Federal Court (3), High Court (2).
How many court cases involve AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD?
AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD appears in 5 published judgments from May 2019 to July 2025. Most commonly as respondent (3 cases).
In which Malaysian courts has AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD appeared?
AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD has appeared across Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) (3 cases) and High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (2 cases), totaling 5 judgments.
Practice Areas
INSURANCE: Third party rights against insurer 2 INSURANCE: Third party risks insurance policy 1 INSURANCE: Third party claim– Whether registration imposes liability on insurer notwithstanding insured ceased to have insurable interest in the motor vehicle at the time of accident. 1 INSURANCE: Statutory presumption of liability under section 109(2) of the Road Transport Act 1987. 1 INSURANCE: Statutory protection to road accident victims 1 INSURANCE: Declaratory order under section 96(3) of the Road Transport Act 1987- Whether suitable to determine liability in negligence arising out of use of motor vehicle. 1 This appeal arises from a negligence action in which it was not disputed that the Appellant (the Plaintiff in the court below) sustained injuries. The fundamental issue for determination is whether those injuries were caused by the negligence of the First Respondent (the First Defendant in the court below), or whether they resulted from some alternative cause. 1 A notable feature of this case is the shift in position taken by the First and Second Respondents (the Defendants in the Court below), that is, the driver and owner of the vehicle in question, who initially denied liability, but later went further to deny any involvement in the accident altogether. To those familiar with motor vehicle insurance litigation, such shifts in position are not uncommon and often raise concerns regarding the veracity of claims, particularly in light of the prevalence of fraudulent claims intended to deceive insurers. 1
Respondent (3)
ba-12b-127-12-2024 MYHC
MUHAMMAD IQBAL BIN AHMAD ROSLAN v 1. ) LOGANATHAN A/L VELLAYATHAM 2. ) AmGeneral Insurance Berhad 3. ) GOVINDAMAH A/P VEERAN
16 July 2025
02f35-05-2018b MYFC
RHB Islamic Bank Berhad v 1. AmGeneral Insurance Berhad 2. Sun Life Malaysia Takaful Berhad 3. Veheng Global Traders Sdn Bhd
12 May 2019
ca-no-02f-36-05-2018-b MYFC
VEHENG GLOBAL TRADES SDN BHD v AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD & 1 LAGI
12 May 2019