A

AMBANK BERHAD

Organisation 14 cases

About AMBANK BERHAD

AMBANK BERHAD appears as a party in 14 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning May 2017 to November 2025. AMBANK BERHAD appeared as appellant in 3 cases, petitioner in 3 cases, plaintiff in 3 cases. Cases span the High Court (9), Federal Court (5).

Case areas include Civil Procedure (2 cases), REVIEW RULE 137 DE FACTO DOCTRINE NO GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT FINALITY OF LITIGATION (1 cases), Bankruptcy (1 cases).

How many court cases involve AMBANK BERHAD?

AMBANK BERHAD appears in 14 published judgments from May 2017 to November 2025. Most commonly as appellant (3 cases).

In which Malaysian courts has AMBANK BERHAD appeared?

AMBANK BERHAD has appeared across High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (9 cases) and Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) (5 cases), totaling 14 judgments.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure 2 Company Law 2 Land Law 1 The respondent sued the appellant bank for a purported shortfall in the size of the land that it had purchased at a public auction. The claim was dismissed at first instance but allowed on appeal. We reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal upon answering the first question posed on appeal 1 Bankruptcy 1 REVIEW RULE 137 DE FACTO DOCTRINE NO GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT FINALITY OF LITIGATION 1 Wound up on the ground that it is unable to pay its debts-failure to comply with statutory notice of demand issued under section 466(1)(a)-service of cause papers- rule 25(1) of the Companies (Winding -Up) Rules 1972-rule 24 of the Companies (Winding -Up) Rules 1972-debst are not disputed-no affidavit in opposition-presumption of insolvency-debts remain unpaid-unsatisfactory explanation or opposition given by the Respondent-no evidence to suggest that the company is solvent-no attempt to settle the debt-absence of payment confirms a state of financial distress-court may also order winding up if it is just and equitable to do so-the persistent default and silence of the company justifies the exercise of this discretion-presumption of insolvency stands unrebutted. 1 The Applicant is a Judgment Creditor, having secured a judgment against the Respondent in 2023, thereby rendering the Defendant a Judgment Debtor. To enforce the said judgment, the Judgment Creditor initiated garnishee proceedings against the Judgment Debtor’s accounts in 18 banks, pursuant to Order 49 of the Rules of Court 2012. However, these efforts proved futile when the High Court at Shah Alam, in Suit BA-37G-104-07/2024 (“Suit 104”), declined to grant the garnishee order absolute sought by the Plaintiff. The present dispute specifically concerns the Judgment Creditor and the Sixth Garnishee. Having successfully resisted the Judgment Creditor’s application for a garnishee order absolute before the Shah Alam High Court in Suit 104, the Sixth Garnishee now faces a fresh challenge 1

Petitioner (3)

wa-28pw-262-06-2025 MYHC

AMBANK (M) BERHAD PIHAK TERKILAN RHB BANK BERHAD v PAK CHUN CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD

17 November 2025

cb-28ncc-13-09-2023 MYHC

AMBANK (M) BERHAD v EG ISMAA DYNAMIC SDN. BHD.

ba-28ncc-601-09-2024 MYHC

AMBANK (M) BERHAD v TOP BUILDERS CAPITAL BERHAD (formerly known as Ikhmas Jaya Group Berhad)

Aggrieved Party (1)

wa-28jm-21-07-2024 MYHC

TETUAN KRISH MANIAM & CO v Sarawak Cable Berhad PENCELAH 1. ) Leader Cable Industry Bhd (Dalam Likuidasi) 2. ) Universal Cable (M) Berhad (Dalam Likuidasi) 3. ) MAHMUD ABU BEKIR TAIB PIHAK TERKILAN 1. ) Hong Leong Islamic Bank Berhad 2. ) AmBank (M) Berhad 3. ) LIM SIN HAN

3 November 2025

Judgment Creditor (1)

wa-29ncc-40-01-2021 MYHC

PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) AmBank (M) Berhad 2. ) Alliance Investment Bank Berhad 3. ) Malayan Banking Berhad 4. ) Malaysian Industrial Development Finance Berhad 5. ) CIMB Bank Berhad PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Lim Sue Beng

Plaintiff (3)

wa-22ncc-219-04-2024 MYHC

AMBANK (M) BERHAD v 1. ) WRP ASIA PACIFIC SDN BHD 2. ) LEE SON HONG 3. ) WRP SPECIALTY PRODUCTS SDN BHD (PENERIMA DAN PENGURUS DILANTIK)

wa-22ncc-396-06-2024 MYHC

AMBANK (M) BERHAD v 1. ) HIGAIN VENTURES SDN BHD 2. ) LX MODE (M) SDN BHD 3. ) ZAHARUDIN BIN ZAINOL RASHID 4. ) EDDEE DZULKARNEIN BIN ZAHARUDIN

12bncc-43-10-2016 MYHC

Ambank (M) Berhad v Tee Sze Ping & Lee Yuh Yun

Garnishee (1)

ba-37g-104-07-2024 MYHC

SENG SAN BING v PETER CHARLES SMERLING PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1. ) AFFIN BANK BERHAD 2. ) ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 3. ) AMBANK (M) BERHAD 4. ) BANK OF AMERICA MALAYSIA BERHAD 5. ) BNP PARIBAS MALAYSIA BERHAD 6. ) CIMB BANK BERHAD 7. ) CIMB ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD 8. ) CITIBANK BERHAD 9. ) DEUTSCHE BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 10. ) HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD 11. ) HSBC BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 12. ) J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK BERHAD 13. ) MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD 14. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 15. ) PUBLIC BANK...

Appellant (3)

02f-33-07-2020b MYFC

AMBANK (M) BERHAD v AIM EDITION SDN BHD

03-1-03-2018-w MYFC

AmBank (M) Berhad & 6 Lagi v Lim Sue Beng

03-1-03-2018w MYFC

AmBank (M) Berhad & 6 lagi v Lim Sue Beng

Respondent (2)

08rs-3-08-2018w-heart-together-with-08rs-6-08-2018w-08rs-7-08-2018w-08rs-12-10-2018b-08rs-13-11-2018w-08rs-14-11-2018a-08rs-17-12-2018w MYFC

1. ) 1.YONG TSHU KHIN 2.ANNIE QUAH LAY NAH 2. ) 1.YONG TSHU KHIN 2.ANNIE QUAH LAY NAH 3. ) YAKIN TENGGARA SDN BHD 4. ) DATUK LIM SUE BENG 5. ) TAN BOON LEE 6. ) 1.TAN WEI HONG 2.TAN WEI JIE 3.TAN HUN KHONG 4.LAI CHEW LAI 5.CHUAN HUNG CHIEN v 1. ) 1.DAHAN CIPTA SDN BHD 2.N.LETCHUMANAN 2. ) MMCE PROPERTIES SDN BHD 3. ) ANBAZAGAN A/L RAMASAMY 4. ) 1.GULA PERAK BERHAD 2.AMBANK (M) BERHAD 3.FAITHMONT ESTATE SDN BHD 4.DATUK LIM SUE BENG 5. ) 1.GULA PERAK BERHAD 2.AMBANK (M) BERHAD 3.FAITHMONT ESTAT...

29 November 2020

01f-20-06-2016b MYFC

CIMB BANK BERHAD (NO. SYARIKAT: 13491-P) … PERAYU v 1. AMBANK (M) BERHAD (NO. SYARIKAT: 8515-D) 2. PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KLANG 3. PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN SELANGOR … RESPONDENRESPONDEN