S
Shanker a/l Sivapragasam
About Shanker a/l Sivapragasam
Shanker a/l Sivapragasam has appeared as counsel in 2 judgments in the MY Case Law database, spanning October 2025 to October 2025. Role breakdown: counsel for defendant (2). Appearances span the Court of Appeal (2). Admitted to the Malaysian Bar on 2006-11-10.
2
Appearances
2006
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel
How many court cases has Shanker a/l Sivapragasam appeared in?
Shanker a/l Sivapragasam has appeared in 2 published judgments from October 2025 to October 2025. Appearances span the Court of Appeal (2).
Practice Areas (from case appearances)
In essence, the Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the portion of its claim that the Learned JC had partly dismissed while the Defendant was dissatisfied with the portion of the Plaintiff’s claim that the Learned JC had partly allowed. 2 * Whether the Learned JC was correct to find that the plaintiff was not entitled to a cause of action under the tenancy agreement for alleged overdue rental. * whether the Learned JC was correct to find that the plaintiff was entitled to a cause of action for trespass only up to the issuance of form k. * whether the Learned JC was correct to allow the plaintiff’s alternative claim for trespass specifically over the access road * whether the Learned JC was correct to dismiss the plaintiff’s alternative claim for trespass specifically over the unidentifiable land. 2 Appeal 313 was the Plaintiff’s Appeal against the Learned JC’s decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s claim for alleged rent arrears for both Rented Lots (and alternatively against the Learned JC’s decision dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim for trespass specifically upon the Unidentifiable Land) 1 Appeal 373 was the Defendant’s Appeal against the Learned JC’s decision to allow the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant for trespassing the Access Road in the interim when the acquisition was first commenced until the time the Access Road was appropriately vested unto the State Authority. 1