Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman
About Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman
Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2023–2025). These were heard before MYCOA (2) and MYHC (2).
On the court record
The reported matters span contract and restitution, housing-development damages and accident litigation, argued in the High Court at Shah Alam and Johor Bahru and before the Court of Appeal.
Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman's reported matters cover contract and restitution, housing-development claims and personal-injury litigation, argued in the High Court and the Court of Appeal. A contract and privity question appears in a Court of Appeal matter where a claimant, whose original contract had been novated to a concessionaire, sought to recover against government respondents with whom it had no direct contractual relationship, relying on unjust enrichment and quantum meruit under section 71 of the Contracts Act 1950. Appearing for a respondent, the Court held there was no privity and that a claim in restitution could not stand where a valid subsisting contract existed with a third party, and it dismissed the appeal with costs.
Civil-procedure and personal-injury themes feature in a Court of Appeal application for leave to appeal under section 68(1)(a) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, arising from a road-accident liability dispute, where the question was whether there was a prima facie case of error justifying interference with concurrent findings of fact. Acting for the applicant, the Court found the threshold for leave had not been met and dismissed the application with costs of RM10,000.
Housing-development litigation is a further strand. In a High Court originating summons at Shah Alam concerning late delivery of parcels in a named development, argued under the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act and the Ang Ming Lee line on extensions of time, he appeared for the developer; the Court ordered liquidated ascertained damages, recording that LAD dibayar oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif-Plaintif (liquidated ascertained damages to be paid by the developer to the purchasers), together with interest at five per cent per year. The profile also includes a fatal-accident appeal engaging sections 7 and 8 of the Civil Law Act 1956 on dependency and loss of earning capacity, rounding out reported work across contract, consumer-housing and accident litigation.
How many cases has Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman appeared in?
Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Malaysia judgments (2023–2025).
Which courts does Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman appear in?
Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman appears before MYCOA (2) and MYHC (2).
What areas of law feature in Khairul Aiman bin Kamar Rozaman's reported cases?
They include contract and restitution (privity, novation and quantum meruit under section 71 of the Contracts Act 1950), housing-development liquidated ascertained damages claims, and personal-injury and fatal-accident litigation under the Civil Law Act 1956.
What did the Court of Appeal decide in the privity and restitution appeal?
Appearing for a respondent, the Court held there was no privity between the claimant and the government respondents and that a restitutionary claim could not stand where a valid subsisting contract existed with a third party, and it dismissed the appeal with costs.
What order did the High Court make in the housing-development matter?
The Court ordered liquidated ascertained damages for late delivery, recorded in Malay as LAD dibayar oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif-Plaintif (liquidated ascertained damages to be paid by the developer to the purchasers), with interest at five per cent per year.