A

Azlan Bin Abdul Razak

Azlan Razak & Associates Called to the Bar in 2014 3 appearances

About Azlan Bin Abdul Razak

Azlan Bin Abdul Razak appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2025–2026). These were heard before MYHC (3).

On the court record

The reported matters span serious criminal defence and civil procedure, grounded in High Court judgments rather than any ranking.

Azlan Bin Abdul Razak's reported matters span serious criminal appeals and civil procedure, argued in the High Court. A significant criminal matter concerned sexual offences against children, where the charge was of physical sexual assault and the appeal was against both conviction and sentence, raising whether the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and, in particular, the credibility of the child witness. Appearing for the appellant, and the matter having come by way of cross-appeals, the High Court dealt with the appeals against conviction and sentence and, on sentence, allowed the appeal in part by increasing the term of imprisonment from six years to seven, reflecting the gravity with which the courts treat offences against children.

The profile also reaches civil procedure. In a matter where a defendant applied to strike out the plaintiff's writ and statement of claim under Order 18 rule 19(1) of the Rules of Court 2012, on the grounds that the pleading disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was scandalous, frivolous or vexatious, or was otherwise an abuse of process, he appeared for the plaintiff; the Court allowed the striking-out application and ordered costs of RM10,000 to be paid by the plaintiff.

A thread across these decisions is the testing of the sufficiency of a case, whether in a criminal appeal turning on the credibility of a vulnerable witness and the proof of a serious charge, or in a civil matter where a pleading is challenged as disclosing no reasonable cause of action. The reported work thus spans serious criminal defence and civil procedure, argued in the High Court of Malaya, and grounded in the judgments rather than any ranking. It reflects a practice that moves between the protection of an accused's rights on appeal and the everyday management of civil litigation, and that engages both the credibility of witnesses in the most serious cases and the adequacy of a pleaded claim on paper.

3
Appearances
2014
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

How many cases has Azlan Bin Abdul Razak appeared in?

Azlan Bin Abdul Razak appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2025–2026).

Which courts does Azlan Bin Abdul Razak appear in?

Azlan Bin Abdul Razak appears before MYHC (3).

What areas of law feature in Azlan Bin Abdul Razak's reported cases?

They include a serious criminal appeal concerning sexual offences against children and the credibility of a child witness, and civil procedure on an application to strike out a writ and statement of claim under Order 18 rule 19 of the Rules of Court 2012.

What did the High Court decide on sentence in the child-sexual-offence appeal?

Coming by way of cross-appeals, the Court allowed the appeal on sentence in part by increasing the term of imprisonment from six years to seven, reflecting the gravity with which offences against children are treated; he appeared for the appellant.

How did the striking-out matter conclude?

Appearing for the plaintiff, the Court allowed the defendant's application to strike out the writ and statement of claim under Order 18 rule 19(1) and ordered costs of RM10,000 to be paid by the plaintiff.

Practice Areas (from case appearances)

Counsel Appellant (2)

Counsel Plaintiff (1)