Panglima David Wong Dak Wah
About FCJ Panglima David Wong Dak Wah
Panglima David Wong Dak Wah has 36 reported Malaysia decisions (2018–2020). These were decided across MYFC (36). By subject matter, the largest shares are Constitutional Law (7), Civil Procedure (4) and Criminal Procedure (4). Of these, 3 as the delivering judge and 33 sitting on the coram.
On the judicial record
Gathers apex-court decisions on the federation's constitutional architecture, the protection of native customary rights, and the construction of insolvency and administrative statutes, where the Federal Court's ruling binds the courts below.
Panglima David Wong Dak Wah sits in the Federal Court, the apex court of Malaysia, and this collection gathers final appellate decisions to which he contributed across public and private law. Administrative and constitutional law is prominent, including judicial-review appeals against decisions of the Director General of National Registration and appeals engaging the powers of a State Legislative Assembly and its Speaker in Sarawak. Native customary rights are a recurring and significant strand, including review applications under rule 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court concerning whether an earlier native-title decision commanded a majority and whether section 78 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 had been complied with — questions that go to the integrity of the apex court's own process. Banking, finance and insolvency feature through bankruptcy appeals under sections 6(3) and 105(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1967, addressing the annulment of an adjudication and receiving order and the relevant date for the debtor's position. Professional-disciplinary and medical-council matters appear, as do land disputes and a challenge concerning the alienation of qualified title by a State Authority. Because the Federal Court sits in panels and its rulings bind the courts below, these decisions settle points of general importance rather than merely resolving the dispute at hand, and several concern the proper limits of executive and administrative power. Private individuals are referred to by role; corporate, governmental and statutory parties are named. Several of these appeals also turn on the apex court's own procedure and the finality of its decisions, a reminder that at this level the questions are as much about the court's institutional role as about the parties before it. The collection is valuable for showing how a Federal Court judge engages with the constitutional architecture of the federation, the protection of native customary rights, and the correct construction of the statutes that govern insolvency and administrative decision-making, and for the durable precedents that follow when the apex court speaks.
Education
- 🎓 graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce (BCom
- 🎓 Bachelor of Laws (LL
- 🎓 University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia
How many cases has Panglima David Wong Dak Wah decided?
Panglima David Wong Dak Wah has 36 reported Malaysia decisions (2018–2020), 3 of them as the delivering judge.
Which courts does Panglima David Wong Dak Wah sit in?
Panglima David Wong Dak Wah sits in MYFC (36).
At what level does Panglima David Wong Dak Wah sit, and what marks his docket?
He sits in the Federal Court, the apex court. His reported docket is marked by public and constitutional law — judicial review of national-registration and legislative-assembly decisions — and by a significant strand of native customary rights, alongside bankruptcy and administrative-law appeals.
What native-rights procedural question appears in this collection?
Review applications under rule 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court concerning whether an earlier native-title decision commanded a majority and whether section 78 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 was complied with — questions going to the integrity of the apex court's own decision-making process.