S

Saiful, Roger & Co.

1 case · 3 lawyers

About Saiful, Roger & Co.

Saiful, Roger & Co. has appeared in 1 judgment in the MY Case Law database, spanning November 2025 to November 2025. Case appearances span the Court of Appeal (1). Role breakdown: counsel for appellant (1).

1
Cases
3
Lawyers (in cases)
1
Appearances

How many cases has Saiful, Roger & Co. handled?

Saiful, Roger & Co. has appeared in 1 published judgment from November 2025 to November 2025. Appearances span the Court of Appeal (1).

Practice Areas (from case appearances)

These were related appeals involving allegations of breach of fiduciary duty and misuse of confidential information. The Respondent, Flowbird (formerly known as Cale Malaysia Sdn Bhd), alleged that its former employees, Alain Taher Osterlind and Rafizuddin, had disclosed its confidential information to IEM, a Swiss-incorporated company engaged in a similar business. The information was allegedly used by IEM to secure parking solution projects in New Zealand, Indonesia, and Malaysia. The learned Judicial Commissioner found in favour of Flowbird. On appeal, the Court of Appeal upheld the findings of the High Court, holding that the evidence established the misuse of confidential information and breach of fiduciary duty by Rafizuddin and IEM. 1

Lawyers (3)

Nur Afiqah Bt Mohd Ashriee Siti Nur Athirazatti Rohizad Nur Sabreena Jazzmyn Melody Binti Mohd Hassan Ali Abdullah

Cases (1)

w-02ncvcw-741-05-2024 MYCOA
RAFIZUDDIN BIN RAMLY v FLOWBIRD MALAYSIA SDN BHD
5 November 2025