Chambers of Zainul Rijal
Contact Information
About Chambers of Zainul Rijal
Chambers of Zainul Rijal appears in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2023–2025). These were heard before MYFC (2) and MYHC (1).
On the court record
The firm's record engages questions of significant public importance at the boundary of civil and Islamic law, including the reviewability of a gazetted fatwa and the constitutional limits on the unilateral conversion of children under Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution.
Chambers of Zainul Rijal appears in the corpus as counsel in administrative and constitutional litigation concerning Islamic law, appearing before the Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) and the High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) in matters of considerable public importance.
A significant matter concerns the judicial review of a fatwa. Acting for the respondent, the firm appeared where the court considered the validity of a gazetted fatwa, whether it could lawfully apply to a company limited by guarantee and to non-Muslim individuals, whether it could direct federal agencies to block social-media content or mandate the confiscation of publications under powers reserved to federal legislation such as the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984, and whether a fatwa gazetted under section 49 of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003 qualifies as subsidiary legislation reviewable for constitutionality and reasonableness.
The firm also appeared in a matter concerning the unilateral conversion of children to Islam. Acting for the appellant, it was engaged where the court considered section 117(b) of the Perlis Administration of the Religion of Islam Enactment and whether the Federal Court's decision in Indira Gandhi was confined to the Federal Territories or applied to Perlis, the reading of the word parent in Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution, whether a certificate of conversion is conclusive proof, and the principle that a decision of the Syariah Courts made outside their jurisdiction may be set aside by the civil courts and that consent cannot confer jurisdiction.
In a related judicial-review matter the firm appeared on an application for leave to intervene under Order 53 rule 8 of the Rules of Court 2012, engaging whether a proposed intervener was a proper person with a direct interest. The firm's record is a specialised public-law practice at the intersection of civil and Islamic law.
How many cases has Chambers of Zainul Rijal been involved in?
Chambers of Zainul Rijal appears in 3 reported Malaysia judgments (2023–2025).
Which courts does Chambers of Zainul Rijal appear in?
Chambers of Zainul Rijal appears before MYFC (2) and MYHC (1).
What is Chambers of Zainul Rijal known for in the reported corpus?
The firm appears in administrative and constitutional litigation concerning Islamic law, including the judicial review of a fatwa and the unilateral conversion of children to Islam, reaching the Federal Court.
What did the firm's fatwa matter examine?
The court considered whether a gazetted fatwa could apply to a company limited by guarantee and non-Muslims, whether it could direct federal agencies to act under powers reserved to federal law, and whether a fatwa gazetted under section 49 of the Selangor enactment is reviewable subsidiary legislation.
What conversion issue arose in the firm's work?
The court considered whether the Federal Court's decision in Indira Gandhi applied to Perlis, the reading of the word parent in Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution, and the principle that a Syariah Court decision made outside its jurisdiction may be set aside by the civil courts.