Interlocutory application
9 cases · January 2025 to October 2025
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Mandatory injunction — When a respondent is ordered to deposit a sum of money by a certain time and there is non-compliance of that order leading to a committal proceedings, whether the plaintiff can then apply pursuant to Order 45 Rule 6 to set a new time for the respondent to comply with that injunction order — Whether the court has power under Order 45 Rule 6 to fix an additional date for performance — Whether the court may set a new time for performance under its inherent power 1 Determination on Question of Laws — Contentious probate matter — Allegation of fraud in obtaining Letters of Administration — Letter of Administration of trust property — Administrator in the capacity of creditor — Whether the grant was validly granted — Whether there is any fraud involved — Insufficient agreed facts — Viva voce evidence required to determine the issues — Order 14A of the Rules of Court 2012 — Section 22 & 30 of the Probate and Administration Act 1959 1 application by the Respondent to set aside the Order under Sections 38 and 39 of the Arbitration Act 2005 and Order 69 rule 8 of the Rules of Court 2012. 1 application by the Plaintiff for an injunction restraining the Defendants and their agents from retaking possession and/or to allow the Plaintiff continued access to the demised premises as well as to injunct the Defendants from interfering with the Plaintiff’s right as a tenant. 1 application by the Plaintiff for an injunction restraining the Defendants and their agents from dealing with two pieces of lands in any manner pending the disposal of this suit. 1 Plaintiff’s application pursuant to Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 against the Defendant for summary judgment. 1 the application by the 1st Defendant to set aside judgment in default of appearance obtained by the Plaintiff. 1 An interim injunction against the defendant to preserve the status quo of the premises pending the disposal of the main suit — The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendant, a subsidiary of Malaysia Airport Holdings Berhad, which operates Malaysia International Airports, KLIA Terminal 1 and KLIA Terminal 2, from exercising its right to terminate the plaintiff for a breach of authorised use — The Plaintiff is operating one Airport Lounge (Plaza Premium Lounge) and three Food & Beverage Outlets which are Flight Club Signature (FCS), The Summerhouse (TS) and Flight Club (FC) in KLIA 1 — Defendant is responsible for the management, operation, maintenance and development of the KLIA — For KLIA Terminal 1, Defendant provides airport services to more than 23 million passengers annually and manages more than 100 tenants, ranging from core business types such as retail, food and beverages, services, and tenancies such as storage and offices — The defendant has rented out 56 food and beverage outlets at KLIA. 1 Application by Intervener for declaration that Plaintiff’s refusal to accept security offered by the Intervener — Whether the refusal made by the Plaintiff to accept security offered was wrongful and unreasonable — Order 70 Rule 33 Rules of Court 2012 — The Plaintiff had no obligation to deal with the Intervener with regard to its proposed Solicitors Agreement when it lacked legal capacity 1
Mandatory injunction — When a respondent is ordered to deposit a sum of money by a certain time and there is non-compliance of that order leading to a committal proceedings, whether the plaintiff can then apply pursuant to Order 45 Rule 6 to set a new time for the respondent to comply with that injunction order — Whether the court has power under Order 45 Rule 6 to fix an additional date for performance — Whether the court may set a new time for performance under its inherent power 1 case
Determination on Question of Laws — Contentious probate matter — Allegation of fraud in obtaining Letters of Administration — Letter of Administration of trust property — Administrator in the capacity of creditor — Whether the grant was validly granted — Whether there is any fraud involved — Insufficient agreed facts — Viva voce evidence required to determine the issues — Order 14A of the Rules of Court 2012 — Section 22 & 30 of the Probate and Administration Act 1959 1 case
application by the Respondent to set aside the Order under Sections 38 and 39 of the Arbitration Act 2005 and Order 69 rule 8 of the Rules of Court 2012. 1 case
application by the Plaintiff for an injunction restraining the Defendants and their agents from retaking possession and/or to allow the Plaintiff continued access to the demised premises as well as to injunct the Defendants from interfering with the Plaintiff’s right as a tenant. 1 case
application by the Plaintiff for an injunction restraining the Defendants and their agents from dealing with two pieces of lands in any manner pending the disposal of this suit. 1 case
Plaintiff’s application pursuant to Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 against the Defendant for summary judgment. 1 case
the application by the 1st Defendant to set aside judgment in default of appearance obtained by the Plaintiff. 1 case
Application by Intervener for declaration that Plaintiff’s refusal to accept security offered by the Intervener — Whether the refusal made by the Plaintiff to accept security offered was wrongful and unreasonable — Order 70 Rule 33 Rules of Court 2012 — The Plaintiff had no obligation to deal with the Intervener with regard to its proposed Solicitors Agreement when it lacked legal capacity 1 case
Key Statutes
Federal Constitution
cited in 1 case Rules of Court 2012
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Cases
b-02imncvc-1817-11-2023
1. ) PUGANESVARAN A/L LACHEMANAN 2. ) NAGARAJAN A/L S. LACHEMANAN v LACHEMANAN A/L SINNASAMY
22 October 2025
MYCOA
ba-22ncvc-393-10-2024
1. ) SISSHAANE VASUTHEVAN 2. ) RISHAANIE 3. ) SUMITRA DEWI A/P R PARAMARAJAH v GHANA MOORTHY A/L MUTHIAH
19 August 2025
MYHC
pa-24ncvc-410-04-2024
FOSHAN CITY, SHUNDE DISTRICT, BONKE KITCHEN & SANITARY INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD v LIM KIAN AIK
18 March 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-191-12-2024
THEAN SENG SMART TRADING SDN. BHD. v 1. ) WELLESLEY ASSETS I SDN. BHD. 2. ) Tan Huei Yee (selaku CEO dan/atau wakil/pegawai Defendan Pertama dan/atau Defendan Keenam dan/atau individu) 3. ) Eric Tang (selaku COO dan/atau wakil/pegawai Defendan Pertama dan/atau Defendan Keenam dan/atau individu) 4. ) Rajender A/l Muniandy (selaku wakil/pegawai Defendan Pertama dan/atau Defendan Keenam dan/atau individu) 5. ) Pearly Foong (selaku wakil/pegawai Defendan Pertama dan/atau Defendan Keenam dan/atau ...
3 March 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-178-12-2024
VHH VENTURE HOLDINGS SDN BHD v 1. ) KLIFE GLOBAL SDN BHD (Pengurus dan Penerima dilantik) 2. ) ANDREW HENG 3. ) GREEN RAY TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD 4. ) SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD
27 February 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncc-58-08-2024
1. ) Ng Soo Loon 2. ) Zhou Li 3. ) Chengwu County Zhongxin Agricultural Products Trading Co v 1. ) Loo Heng Huat (seorang individu dan / atau pemilik yang berniaga dalam gaya dan nama perniagaan LHH Global Enterprise) 2. ) Loo Heng Loke 3. ) Lee Kar Kiat (seorang individu dan / atau pemilik yang berniaga dalam gaya dan nama perniagaan LHH Global Enterprise )
24 February 2025
MYHC
pa-22ncvc-142-08-2023
Yohana Banunaek (Pentadbir Bagi Harta Pusaka Adelina Lisao, Simati) v 1. ) Jayavartiny A/p Ramalue 2. ) AMBIKA A/P M.A. SHANMUGAM
19 February 2025
MYHC
ba-22ncvc-290-07-2024
PLAZA PREMIUM LOUNGE MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. v MALAYSIA AIRPORTS (SEPANG) SDN. BHD.
16 January 2025
MYHC
wa-27ncc-1-01-2024
ASL BULK MARINE LIMITED v OWNERS OR DEMISE CHARTERERS OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL STINGRAY PENCELAH Gladys Holdings Incorporated
6 January 2025
MYHC