INFRAPRIMA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v BUDAYA RESTU SDN BHD PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1. ) Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor (PKNS) 2. ) AIR KELANTAN SDN BHD

wa-37g-334-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 2 November 2025 • WA-37G-334-11/2024

Catchwords

Enclosure 26. CIVIL PROCEDURE: Garnishee proceedings in relation to construction contract; Garnishee order nisi; Garnishee order absolute; Whether the debt due or accruing due under Order 49 Rules of Court 2012; whether the amount claimed by the Judgement creditor from the garnishee is a crystallised actionable debt; whether Retention sum is part of debt due; Effect of non-participation of judgment debtor;

Practice Areas

Enclosure 26. CIVIL PROCEDURE: Garnishee proceedings in relation to construction contract; Garnishee order nisi; Garnishee order absolute; Whether the debt due or accruing due under Order 49 Rules of Court 2012; whether the amount claimed by the Judgement creditor from the garnishee is a crystallised actionable debt; whether Retention sum is part of debt due; Effect of non-participation of judgment debtor;

Judges (1)

Rajes Raghavji Delivered

Parties (4)

AIR KELANTAN Sdn Bhd Garnishee BUDAYA RESTU Sdn Bhd Defendant INFRAPRIMA CONSTRUCTION Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor Garnishee

Case Significance

INFRAPRIMA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v BUDAYA RESTU SDN BHD PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1.... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 2, 2025 (citation: wa-37g-334-11-2024). The case was decided by Rajes Raghavji.

What was the outcome of INFRAPRIMA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v BUDAYA RESTU SDN BHD PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1....?

INFRAPRIMA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v BUDAYA RESTU SDN BHD PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1.... is a High Court decision dated November 2, 2025. The case was heard by Rajes Raghavji. See the full judgment for details.