BAHTERA OFFSHORE (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) ETIQA GENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD 2. ) QBE INSURANCE (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 3. ) GENERALI INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD (dahulunya AXA AFFIN GENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD)

wa-27ncc-38-08-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 10 February 2026 • WA-27NCC-38-08/2025 • 14 min read

5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Outcome

For the reasons above, I dismissed P Order 33 application in Enclosure 13. I awarded costs of RM 8,000 to the Defendants.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-27ncc-38-08-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Determination of certain questions of law and fact under Order 33 rule 2 and rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012 – Whether a determination of such question will result in a substantial saving of time and expenditure – Whether there are facts are in dispute – Whether extrinsic evidence needs to be adduced.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Quay Chew Soon Delivered

Counsel (7)

Azhar Yong & Co. Firm Shaikh David & Co Firm James Premkumar David Counsel Defendant Lim Yik Jin Counsel Defendant Mohan Das Nair Counsel Plaintiff Ravin Woodhull Counsel Plaintiff Yong Chee Kong Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

BAHTERA OFFSHORE Sdn Bhd Plaintiff ETIQA GENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD Defendant GENERALI INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD Defendant QBE INSURANCE BERHAD Defendant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (5)

MY (5)

[1980] 1 MLJ 313 [2003] 1 MLJ 149 [2004] 1 MLJ 8 [2018] MLJU 662 [2020] MLJU 1569

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-27ncc-38-08-2025)