1. ) ROSAH TIMBER & TRADING SDN BHD 2. ) BEIJING MILIION SDN BHD v 1. ) PENGARAH PERHUTANAN, PAHANG 2. ) Kerajaan Negeri Pahang 3. ) YAYASAN PAHANG

wa-25-565-11-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 April 2025 • WA-25-565-11/2022

Catchwords

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review – State Authority – Approval of logging area – Licence to take away forest produce – Licensee different entity – Applicants rights under private agreement – Licensee did not appoint contractor to extract forest produce – Role of State Director of Forestry – Timber – Locus standi – Whether proper parties sued – Sections 3(1), 14, 15(1), 16 18, 19, 22, 23 of the National Forestry Act 1984

Practice Areas

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review

Judges (1)

Amarjeet Singh a/l Serjit Singh Delivered

Parties (5)

BEIJING MILIION Sdn Bhd Applicant Kerajaan Negeri Pahang Respondent PENGARAH PERHUTANAN, PAHANG Respondent ROSAH TIMBER & TRADING Sdn Bhd Applicant Yayasan Pahang Respondent

Case Significance

1. ) ROSAH TIMBER & TRADING SDN BHD 2. ) BEIJING MILIION SDN BHD v 1. ) PENGA... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 28, 2025 (citation: wa-25-565-11-2022). The case was decided by Amarjeet Singh a/l Serjit Singh.

What was the outcome of 1. ) ROSAH TIMBER & TRADING SDN BHD 2. ) BEIJING MILIION SDN BHD v 1. ) PENGA...?

1. ) ROSAH TIMBER & TRADING SDN BHD 2. ) BEIJING MILIION SDN BHD v 1. ) PENGA... is a High Court decision dated April 28, 2025. The case was heard by Amarjeet Singh a/l Serjit Singh. See the full judgment for details.