TS GLOBAL NETWORK SDN. BHD. v 1. ) TRIBUNAL RAYUAN KOMUNIKASI DAN MULTIMEDIA 2. ) SURUHANJAYA KOMUNIKASI DAN MULTIMEDIA MALAYSIA

wa-25-170-06-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 April 2025 • WA-25-170-06/2023

Catchwords

1. TS Global Network Sdn. Bhd. filed an application for leave to adduce a copy of a further affidavit, as additional evidence and in support of its Judicial Review application (enclosure 1). 2. The Second Respondent contested and argued that the applicant had failed to provide any averment regarding the relevance of the said affidavit, and that the present application should be dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis. 3. I heard this application on 28.04.2025 and I find that this application has no merit and is dismissed with costs in the cause.

Practice Areas

1. TS Global Network Sdn. Bhd. filed an application for leave to adduce a copy of a further affidavit, as additional evidence and in support of its Judicial Review application (enclosure 1). 2. The Second Respondent contested and argued that the applicant had failed to provide any averment regarding the relevance of the said affidavit, and that the present application should be dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis. 3. I heard this application on 28.04.2025 and I find that this application has no merit and is dismissed with costs in the cause.

Judges (1)

Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz Delivered

Parties (3)

SURUHANJAYA KOMUNIKASI DAN MULTIMEDIA MALAYSIA Respondent TS GLOBAL NETWORK Sdn Bhd Applicant Tribunal Rayuan Komunikasi Dan Multimedia Respondent

Case Significance

TS GLOBAL NETWORK SDN. BHD. v 1. ) TRIBUNAL RAYUAN KOMUNIKASI DAN MULTIMEDIA ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 27, 2025 (citation: wa-25-170-06-2023). The case was decided by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz.

What was the outcome of TS GLOBAL NETWORK SDN. BHD. v 1. ) TRIBUNAL RAYUAN KOMUNIKASI DAN MULTIMEDIA ...?

TS GLOBAL NETWORK SDN. BHD. v 1. ) TRIBUNAL RAYUAN KOMUNIKASI DAN MULTIMEDIA ... is a High Court decision dated April 27, 2025. The case was heard by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz. See the full judgment for details.