ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YEOH & COMPANY 3. ) YEOH ENG KONG
Catchwords
[1] The Plaintiff files an application for committal against the 3rd Defendant (D3) (Enclosure 165) and the 1st Defendant (D1) also files the same against the 2nd Defendant (D2) and D3 (Enclosure 169) upon obtaining the order for leave to commence committal proceedings granted by this Court on 17.03.2025. Thereafter, D2 and D3 applied to set aside the order that granted leave for the Plaintiff (Enclosure 174) and D1 (Enclosure 176). [2] Article 126 of the Federal Constitution provides the power of this Court to deal with punishment on contempt- “Power to punish for contempt 126. The Federal Court, the Court of Appeal or a High Court shall have power to punish any contempt of itself.”. This provision is further reiterated in section 13 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Act 91). [3] For these reasons, Enclosure 174 and 176 are dismissed and Enclosure 165 and Enclosure 169 are allowed with costs. This Court therefore, passed the sentence as recorded and ordered accordingly. [4] Subsequent to the sentencing orders, learned counsels for D2 and D3 made an oral application under Order 52 R7 of the ROC to stay the imprisonment order. The application was allowed by this Court subject to compliance of the terms.
Practice Areas
1 The Plaintiff files an application for committal against the 3rd Defendant (D3) (Enclosure 165) and the 1st Defendant (D1) also files the same against the 2nd Defendant (D2) and D3 (Enclosure 169) upon obtaining the order for leave to commence committal proceedings granted by this Court on 17.03.2025. Thereafter, D2 and D3 applied to set aside the order that granted leave for the Plaintiff (Enclosure 174) and D1 (Enclosure 176). 2 Article 126 of the Federal Constitution provides the power of this Court to deal with punishment on contempt- “Power to punish for contempt 126. The Federal Court, the Court of Appeal or a High Court shall have power to punish any contempt of itself.”. This provision is further reiterated in section 13 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Act 91). 3 For these reasons, Enclosure 174 and 176 are dismissed and Enclosure 165 and Enclosure 169 are allowed with costs. This Court therefore, passed the sentence as recorded and ordered accordingly. 4 Subsequent to the sentencing orders, learned counsels for D2 and D3 made an oral application under Order 52 R7 of the ROC to stay the imprisonment order. The application was allowed by this Court subject to compliance of the terms.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YE... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 15, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-2327-08-2022). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.
Key issues: [3] For these reasons, Enclosure 174 and 176 are dismissed and Enclosure 165 and Enclosure 169 are allowed with costs. This Court therefore, passed the sentence as recorded and ordered accordingly..
What was the outcome of ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YE...?
ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YE... is a High Court decision dated June 15, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.