GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM A/P KARUPPIAH 3. ) BALA SUBRAMANIAM A/L MUTHAIAH 4. ) RAMANATHAN A/L GOVINDAN 5. ) RAVAITHIREN A/L THANABALAN 6. ) PRABAVATHY RAVAITHIREN 7. ) CHANDRAMOGAN A/L THEVASUNDRAM 8. ) NITYA KALYANI A/P CHANDRAMOGAN 9. ) RUKUMANI 10. ) NIVEDHA A/P CHANDRAMOGAN @ KAVITA

wa-24ncvc-199-01-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 21 July 2025 • WA-24NCvC-199-01/2025

Catchwords

Injunction – plaintiff as the elected President of the Association which is entitled to manage the Temple is entitled to a mandatory injunction for vacant possession thereof with the view to manage the same

Practice Areas

Injunction

Judges (1)

Su Tiang Joo Delivered

Parties (11)

Bala Subramaniam a/l Muthaiah Respondent Chandramogan a/l Thevasundram Respondent Gunasilan a/l Rengasamy Applicant Maragatham a/p Karuppiah Respondent Munusamy a/l Karuppiah @ Mano Respondent Nitya Kalyani a/p Chandramogan Respondent Nivedha a/p Chandramogan @ Kavita Respondent Prabavathy Ravaithiren Respondent Ramanathan a/l Govindan Respondent Ravaithiren a/l Thanabalan Respondent Rukumani Respondent

Case Significance

GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 21, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-199-01-2025). The case was decided by Su Tiang Joo.

What was the outcome of GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM ...?

GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM ... is a High Court decision dated July 21, 2025. The case was heard by Su Tiang Joo. See the full judgment for details.