Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) v MAHADEVAN A/L K SUBRAMANIAM
Catchwords
[1] In this Originating Summons, the Plaintiff is seeking leave for an extension of time to file and serve the Notice of Appeal against the decision of the Kuala Lumpur Magistrates Court in Civil Suit No.: WA-A72NCvC-3176-08/2022 (Civil Suit) dated 30.08.2023. [2] In this Originating Summons, there was a delay of at least nine (9) months. The reason for the delay was that Ms. Keerthana had wrongly filed the application for an extension of time at the Magistrates Court. Ms. Keerthana had also failed to file the application for extension at the High Court. [3] This Court finds that the delay was inordinate and inexcusable and the mistake of a lawyer handling the matter is not a sufficient ground for granting leave. Therefore, this Originating Summons is dismissed with costs.
Practice Areas
1 In this Originating Summons, the Plaintiff is seeking leave for an extension of time to file and serve the Notice of Appeal against the decision of the Kuala Lumpur Magistrates Court in Civil Suit No.: WA-A72NCvC-3176-08/2022 (Civil Suit) dated 30.08.2023. 2 In this Originating Summons, there was a delay of at least nine (9) months. The reason for the delay was that Ms. Keerthana had wrongly filed the application for an extension of time at the Magistrates Court. Ms. Keerthana had also failed to file the application for extension at the High Court. 3 This Court finds that the delay was inordinate and inexcusable and the mistake of a lawyer handling the matter is not a sufficient ground for granting leave. Therefore, this Originating Summons is dismissed with costs.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) v MAHADEVAN A/L K SUBRAMANIAM is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 13, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-1855-05-2024). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.
What was the outcome of Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) v MAHADEVAN A/L K SUBRAMANIAM?
Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) v MAHADEVAN A/L K SUBRAMANIAM is a High Court decision dated March 13, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.